[1962]DLHC1368 • April 2, 1962 • High Court
ATLANTA TIMBER CO. vs. VICTORIA TIMBER CO. LTD.
ATLANTA TIMBER CO. vs. VICTORIA TIMBER CO. LTD. [HIGH COURT, SEKONDI] [1962] 1 GLR 221 DATE: 2ND APRIL, 1962. COUNSEL: E. B. GAISIE FOR THE PLAINTIFFS-APPLICANTS. JOE REINDORF FOR THE DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. CORAM: CHARLES J. JUDGMENT OF CHARLES J. This is an application for summary judgment under Order 14, rule 1 of the Supreme [High] Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 1954. The plaintiffs have filed an affidavit in support of the application. The defendants filed an affidavit opposing the application. Although they had filed a defence to the action this does not preclude the court from entertaining the application. In McLardy v. Stateum1(1) such an application was successfully made one month after the defence had been filed. In Roberts v. Plant2(2) it was held that the purpose of Order 14 (1) of the English rules which is in pari materia with the provisions of Order 14 (1) of our rules is to enable a plaintiff to obtain summary judgment without ...