[1976]DLHC389 • February 17, 1976 • High Court
GHANA INDUSTRIAL HOLDING CORPORATION vs. ATTOK FISHERIES LTD
The plaintiff sued the defendant for unpaid storage charges amounting to ¢12,347.13 for fish stored at the plaintiff's slaughterhouse at Tema, requested by the defendant. During cross-examination of a former employee of the defendant, a question was raised suggesting the witness had offered to give evidence in favor of the plaintiff for ¢2,000.00, which the defendant's counsel objected to on grounds of relevance and lack of foundation.
read moreJUDGMENT OF GRIFFITHS-RANDOLPH J. In this case, the plaintiffs sued the defendants for an amount of ¢12,347.13 (twelve thousand three hundred and forty-seven cedis thirteen pesewas) as storage charges for fish kept at the slaughter-house of the plaintiffs’ meat products division at Tema at the request of the defendants. A former employee of the defendants having been called by them as a witness; and his examination-in-chief having been completed, he was being subjected to serious cross-examination, when the defendants’ counsel objected to the line of questioning adopted by the counsel for the plaintiffs, particularly to the following suggestion which was put to the witness: “I seriously put it to you that some time last year when the writ was pending you suggested to the plaintiffs’ first witness that if the plaintiff corporation gave you ¢2,000.00, you would give evidence in its favour?” The said objection was as follows: “I object to this question for the follo...