BRIGHT vs. GRAPHIC CORPORATION

JUDGMENT OF OSEI-HWERE J. The plaintiff’s claim against the defendants is for “a return of two printing blocks on swollen shoot or their value of ¢30,000.” In his amended statement of claim the plaintiff pleaded the following pertinent matters among others: “(1) The plaintiff is a physiotherapist and naturopathic physician and doctor of botanic medicine, practising in Cape Coast, and the defendants, a daily newspaper corporation doing business all over the country and in Cape Coast, with headquarters in Accra. (2) On 28 February 1972, the plaintiff despatched a block of healthy and unhealthy cocoa plants on swollen shoot, with an article on swollen shoot for publication for the public to know we have a man here to do the job, instead of asking from abroad; though not advert as it may mean. (3) The defendant-corporation refused or failed to do the publication, and so the plaintiff called for the return of the two blocks, and despite repeated demands the blocks have not...