DOKU vs. DOKU AND ANOTHER

AMPIAH JSC. This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the decision of the High Court, Tamale dated 22 May 1989. In her amended writ of summons, the plaintiff claimed against the defendant for: (1) declaration that House No 1.86, Tamale is the property of the plaintiff; (2) an order of specific performance against 1st defendant to execute a deed of assignment of House No 1.86 to the plaintiff; (3) alternatively an order that House No 1.86 is family property for the benefit of the exclusive family consisting of plaintiff, her children and 1st defendant and that the same cannot be sold by the 1st defendant without the consent of the plaintiff and her children; (4) an order that the sale or purported sale of House No 1.86 by the 1st defendant to 2nd defendant is null and void and of no effect; (5) alternatively a declaration that House No 1.86 is affected by trusts under which the plaintiff and, or, her children are beneficiaries and that the sale by the 1st defendant to the 2nd defendant is...