QUANSAH vs. TETTEH AND ANOTHER

On 5 May 1992, the plaintiff-appellant through her solicitors issued a writ against the two defendants for the following reliefs: “(a) A declaration that plaintiff is a shareholder of the 2nd defendant company; (b) A declaration that the purported re-distribution of shares reducing plaintiff’s shares from 500 to 100 was irregularly and fraudulently done and accordingly null and void and of no legal effect; (c) An order setting aside the purported reduction of plaintiff’s shares in the 2nd defendant company from 500 to 100. (d) An order for the valuation of the 2nd defendant company, for plaintiff to be paid off the value of her shares in the said company.” On being served with the writ, the defendants caused their solicitors firstly, to enter conditional appearance on their behalf and followed it with a motion for the transfer of the suit from Cape Coast to Accra. The main ground on which the application was founded was that both defendants resided and carried on business ...