J.A. ARMAH AND SOCIAL SECURITY BANK LIMITED

It is the view of the Commission therefore that the dismissal of the petitioner is un justifiable and offends against the laws of the land. Vide Quanyson Vrs. A.G. 1981 GLRD 295 (CA); CMB Vrs Agbettor and others (199-06) GLRD 16 (CA) Nartey-Tokoli & others VIS. Valco Ltd. (1939-00) GUR) 112 (S). In the latter case, the Supreme Court held inter alia, that the plaintiff were entitled to a declaration that the termination of their appointment or null and void and of no effect. The Supreme Court further held that the plaintiffs were entitled to receivery their salaries from the dates the ceased to receive them. In Raiden vrs. GUTC's case A3 Saisi J.S.C. as he thon var olivorn judgment of the Court stated that a public officer can be lisica removed from office. Only if he has misconducted himself ars my; fie officer is dismissed or removed from office without just cause the act unconstitutional null and void. The Learned Judge went further to state that in all these cons - instatement ma...