KINGSLEY ANANE AND DARKO FARMS & COMPANY LTD

The original decision on the matter, rendered by the Kumasi Office on 7th July, 1999, dismissed the complaint as unmeritorious on the grounds that: 1. The termination of the complainant's appointment was not wrongful. 2. The complainant had already been paid his entitlement. The complainant takes issues with the decision by his application dated 21st February, 2000 on the grounds that: 1. The money paid to him was his salary and not his entitlement. 2. When government announced payment of gratuity to workers, he did not get his. GUIDING PRINCIPLE FOR REVIEW The Commission is amenable to reviewing its decision: 1. Where new and cogent facts are pleaded. 2. Where it becomes evident that the Commission had misled itself or had been misled by the winning party by deliberate or innocent misrepresentation of facts or law. Applying these guidelines, let us examine the merits of the complainant's application for review. 1. That the payment made to him was his salary and not his enti...