[2003]DLSC6435December 17, 2003Supreme Court

OPANIN KWASI ASAMOAH vs. KWADWO APPEAH AND NANA OWUSU SENYA

The plaintiff, as customary successor to the late Opanyin Kwaku Asare, challenged the devise in Asare’s will of House No. ABH 7 Block B, Aboahia, Ashanti, to the defendants, who were Asare’s children and beneficiaries under the will. The plaintiff contended that the house was not Asare’s self-acquired property but family property originally acquired by Kwame Abebrese, to whose estate Asare had succeeded under customary law. The defendants maintained that the house was Asare’s self-acquired property and further counterclaimed to one-half interests in other properties at Ashanti New Town and Oldmankrom on the basis that Asare and Abebrese had jointly acquired them. The trial court found that the Aboahia house belonged to Abebrese and had devolved as family property, and dismissed the counterclaim as unproved. Portion indicating this appears in Bamford-Addo JSC’s narration beginning: “The brief facts of this case are that Opanyin Kwaku Asare and Opanyin Kwame Abebrese were brothers...” and continuing through the discussion of the plaintiff’s claim and the defendants’ counterclaim.

read more

BAMFORD-ADDO, J.S.C. This is an appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated 4 November 1997 which heard an appeal from the High Court's decision dated 4 November 1992. The Judgment of the Court of Appeal admittedly was unfortunately very short. It merely stated: "By court: having heard the submission of counsel for the parties, and having read the record and considered the evidence, we are hereby satisfied that the learned trial judge arrived at the right conclusion. We find no merit in the appeal. In our opinion the appeal ought to be dismissed. It is dismissed." I think that if submissions had been made before the Court of Appeal as confirmed in the record of appeal at page 181, then it was the duty of the Court of Appeal to have discussed and considered the issues raised and to have given a considered opinion on those points, itself; rather than to simply rely on the decisions and findings made by the trial High Court, however correct and unimpeachable they may be...