GABRIEL K. AGBENYEGA vs. GHANA COMMERCIAL BANK

This ruling is in respect of motion on notice for leave to amend Plaintiff’s reply filed on 4th February, 2010 by the insertion of the following: “4. Plaintiff will add that not only was he not allowed to confront his accusers but that the very composition of the Disciplinary Committee was in breach of Defendant’s own rules effectively rendering its decisions null and void. 5. Plaintiff will add that Defendant’s unilateral decision to pay only his Provident Fund Contributions was never accepted by him; Plaintiff having at all material times protested through his lawyers as well as the Labour Department that he was entitled to more payments and/or entitlements than that which had been paid out,” The Defendant has opposed the said application, hence this ruling. According to the Plaintiff/Applicant he indicated in his evidence in chief without any challenge that he was not allowed to confront his accusers. Also various information came to him when the Defendant te...