EOCO vs. EDWIN KOFI SARFO/VOLTA RESOURCES

RULING The applicant herein, dissatisfied with the ruling of this court on the 26th of April 2013 has filed this present motion for review under Order 42 r 1 (1) of CI 47 and under the inherent jurisdiction of the Court. The inherent jurisdiction of the Court was mentioned in the well celebrated case of Mosi vrs. Bagyina [1963]1GLR 337, holding 4. “… The Power of the court or a judge to set aside any such judgment or order is derived from the inherent jurisdiction of the court to set aside its own void orders…” Now, under Order 42 r 1, it provides “(1) A person who is aggrieved a. By a judgment or order from which an appeal is allowed, but from which no appeal has been preferred; or b. By a judgment or Order from which no appeal is allowed, may upon the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence, was not within that person’s knowledge or could not be produced by that person at the time when the judgment was given or t...