EOCO vs. EDWIN KOFI SARFO/VOLTA RESOURCES

The applicant herein has filed an application for revocation of the Court’s order made on 11th April 2013. The argument of the applicant is contained in its paragraphs 2, 3 & 4. To them (applicant) what EOCO did was to apply for a freezing confirmation when the stipulated time had elapsed. In its response, EOCO deposed to an affidavit per Emily Nuertey opposing the application for revocation. The respondent in paragraphs 6 and 7, it said: ‘6’ “That the applicant/respondent invited the respondent/applicant per a letter dated 26th March 2013 to attend an interview on 10th April 2013 which he failed to honour. Attached as Exhibit ECOCO 1 is a copy of the said letter”. ‘7’ “That on 12th April 2013 a notice of confirmation of freezing of the respondent/applicant’s bank account was posted to the respondent/applicant. Attached as Exhibit EOCO 2 is a copy of the letter”. Exhibit EOCO 1 was an invitation letter to the applicant; a meeting to be held on 10th A...