OPOKU BOATENG & CO. vs. RAOUL ABOU CHEDID & 2 ORS

In this application, the Defendant/Applicants (hereafter called ‘The Defendants) prayed the court to set aside the writ of summons, statement of claim and the motion for interlocutory Injunction filed by the Plaintiff/Respondent (hereafter called ‘The plaintiff). Briefly, the facts are that on the 16th September, 2016, the plaintiff issued a writ of summons asking for the following reliefs: 1. Against the 1st Defendant, an order for the recovery of US$78,750.00 representing 15% of the judgment debt due the 1st Defendant from the 2nd Defendant, as agreed legal fees by the 1st Defendant to the plaintiff 2. An order of perpetual Injunction restraining the 2nd Defendant from paying to the 1st Defendant the sum of US$80,000.00 held by the 2nd Defendant out of the judgment debt due 1st Defendant