NANA AKAKLI IV (PLAINTIFF) vs. G.P.R.T.U REGIONAL SECRETARIAT & ANOR (DEFENDANT)

The 1st and 2nd Defendants entered into an agreement whereby he 2nd Defendant gave the 1st Defendant some number of buses to be sold to its members on hire purchase. This was in 2008. The Plaintiff acquired one of these buses on hire-purchase. By the hire-purchase agreement the Plaintiff was required to complete payment of the cost of bus within 36 months. It was agreed between the 1st Defendant and the Plaintiff that the latter effected payment of GH¢1,400.00 per months. In the course of time the 2nd Defendant acting upon a list of defaulters given to it by the 1st Defendant, embarked on a nationwide exercise and impounded the vehicle which the Plaintiff acquired through the hire-purchase. The ensuing misunderstanding has brought the parties to Court. The Plaintiff therefore asked for the following reliefs:- 1. A declaration that the hire purchase agreement of July 2008 between the Plaintiff and Defendants was valid, legal and binding on the parties. 2. A declaration of bo....