[2016]DLSC11116 • July 5, 2016 • Supreme Court
ABU RAMADAN & NIMAKO (No 3) vs. ELECTORAL COMMISSION & ATTORNEY-GENERAL (No 3)
GBADEGBE JSC delivered tire ruling of the court. The application before the court Pending before us is an application by Abu Ramadan and Evans Nimako the plaintiffs-judgment creditors-applicants (hereafter referred to as the applicants). for clarification and further directions in respect of this court's judgment in Abu Ramadan & Nimako (No 1) v Electoral Commission & Attorney-General [2015-2016] 1 SCGLR 1. The application was expressed in the body of the motion paper to have been brought under our inherent jurisdiction and rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1992 (CI 16). The reliefs prayed for by the applicants numbering four are as follows: "(a) a declaration that the order made by this honourable court, pursuant to the judgment in the instant suit dated 5 May 2016, that the first defendant-respondent Electoral Com mission to ·delete or clean' the current register of voters to conform to the provisions of the 1992 Constitution and applicable laws means the immediate remova.....