CASTRO DANIEL YAO AHIAMO vs. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL & 2 ORS.

JUDGMENT BENIN, JSC:- There is just one, issue raised in this appeal which has been brought by the plaintiff/appellant/appellant called the plaintiff in whose favour the Court of Appeal gave judgment. Effectively, the appeal is against the consequential orders made by the said court whereby it refused to order the re-instatement of the plaintiff as well as his claim for arrears of salary, even after it had nullified his dismissal from the Police Service. The plaintiff was a serving policeman when he was charged with breach of the police regulations. It is not necessary to recount all the details of the infractions of the regulations the appellant was charged with. It suffices to mention that following some sort of inquiry the appellant’s appointment was terminated by the Central Disciplinary Board, the 3rd defendant/respondent/respondent, called the 3rd defendant. The plaintiff appealed to the Inspector General of Police, the 2nd defendant/respondent/respondent, called the 2nd def.....