[2018]DLCA4417 • July 19, 2018 • Court of Appeal

AFRICAN REFORM MOVEMENT vs. THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION

The appellant, African Reform Movement, applied to the Electoral Commission to be registered as a political party under article 55(1) of the 1992 Constitution and sections 8 and 9 of the Political Parties Act, 2000 (Act 574). It was issued a provisional certificate, but the Electoral Commission refused to issue a final certificate on the ground that the appellant had not complied with sections 8(3) and 9(c) of Act 574, particularly the requirement that a party must have branches in all the regions and be organised in not less than two-thirds of the districts in each region. The appellant contended that section 9(c) did not require physical offices or physical presence before final registration and that such a requirement arose only after final registration under section 15(1) of Act 574. The Electoral Commission maintained that section 9(c) required verifiable physical presence in the regions and districts before final registration. Portion of judgment: “Sometime in January 2016, the appellant applied to the respondent pursuant to article 55(1) of the 1992 Constitution of Ghana and section 8(1) of the Political Parties Act 2000 Act 574 to be registered as a political party... The respondent upon reviewing documents presented to it by the appellant refused to register it for noncompliance with section 8(3) and 9(c) of the Political Parties Act...”

read more

KUSI-APPIAH, J.A.: This appeal turns on the correct interpretation to place on section 9(c) of the Political Parties Act, 2000 (Act 574). There are other ancillary matters too. The section provides that: “The commission shall not register a political party under this Act unless – 9(c) the party has branches in all the regions and is, in addition organised in not less than two-thirds of the districts in each region.” The appellant contends that by this provision the respondent’s basis for denying the issue of a final certificate of registration for non-compliance with section 9(c) of Act 574 is misconceived and misplaced because the proper interpretation of section 9(c) of Act 574 does not mean physical existence of party offices in the regions and districts. The respondent contends otherwise. This is the bone of contention in this appeal but as I said earlier there are other grounds of appeal which will be unfolded shortly. I believe that the appellant’s appeal ag...