F & F INVESTMENTS LIMITED vs. REGINALD TECHIE-MENSON, FELICIA TECHIE-MENSON AND WEST AFRICA DOCUMENT WAREHOUSE LTD

1.0 Background 1.1 The nature of facts and issues implicated in this suit has been transformed largely from its original state to its present state as a result of series of amendments of the writ and statement of claim by the plaintiff and resultant amendment of the pleadings in the course of the trial, which invariably had rendered most of the issues the pretrial settlement court set down for trial presently peripheral, indeed otiose. Upon reliance of Domfeh v. Adu [1984-86] 1 GLR 653 CA, I deem it proper to ignore issues I deem irrelevant for purposes of the present state of plaintiff’s case. The Court of Appeal held in that suit that a trial judge is not required to make findings of facts in respect of irrelevant matters when such findings would not in any way assist the court in the determination of the claims and reliefs before the court. The suit as it stands presently calls on the court simply to determine largely whether corporate bodies could enter into oral agreements, and.....