2020 GROUP LIMITED. vs. KLUDJESON INTERNATIONAL LTD

The applications before me touches on the amendment to judgment of the Court as well as the determination of the true and exact judgment debt and others per our leave. In respect of the application filed by the defendant/applicant dated 5/2/2018, counsel for the plaintiff/respondent does not object and to that extent the said application is granted as prayed. Consequently leave is granted the defendant/applicant to file the said processes. The next application relates to the question whether judgment of the Court as stated by the court can be amended in the manner being prayed. I have had regard to the processes filed by the parties in that regard and the submissions made by both parties and I have formed the view that the application fails and same is accordingly dismissed with respect to counsel for the plaintiff/applicant. In coming to this conclusion, I wish to state that order 16 rule 10 of CI 47 cannot be applicable in the instant case when the plaintiff/applicant who had ...