NII ADJABENG ANKRAH II vs. ADOLF ANKRAH & ORS

This is an application for interlocutory injunction. This court will rely on Order 25 rule 1(6) to make a determination by looking only at the papers filed and where necessary address by counsel on specific point of law and/or facts. Counsel for Defendants/Applicants has drawn my attention to the point of law that, the Plaintiff/Respondent has averred that he is a chief. Counsel draws the court’s attention that it has no jurisdiction to pronounce on a chieftaincy matter. With this the stage is set for a determination of the application for interlocutory injunction. The principles governing the grant or refusal of this equitable relief are well-settled. It must also be added that an applicant must identify the land for which he seeks this relief. In the instant case the applicants have not identified the specific land on which they seek to injunct the Plaintiff/Respondent. See the case of Nyipklorpkor vrs. Agbodotor (1984-89) GLR. Again, granted it is a land located in the .....