[2019]DLHC8927 • March 14, 2019 • High Court
NII AKRAMAH NYOMOR BEI II AND 10 OTHERS vs. HUMPHREY DZATOR BOTCWAY AND 11 ORS
Counsel for Defendants/Applicants moved a motion on notice for stay of proceedings in this Court pending the determination of contempt proceedings against 1st Plaintiff/Respondent in another Court. Hereinafter the 1st Defendant/Applicant would be called “Applicant” and the 1st Plaintiff/Respondent would also be called the “Respondent”. Counsel for Applicant contended in his argument in support of the application that the substance of the Plaintiff’s writ is based on a piece of land located at Ngleshie Amanfro and which said land is a stool land, and being a stool land Order 4 r 9 of C. I. 47 shows who can institute an action or issue a writ or defend an action in respect of stool land. Counsel also contended that the 1st Defendant/Applicant is the substantive chief of Ngleshie Amanfro and referred the Court to exhibit “A” annexed to this application. According to Counsel for Applicant, it is the case of the Applicant that he has cited the Respondent for contempt...