ANYETEY CHANTEY vs. TEI KWABLAH KWEINOR

APPAU, JSC:- The Court of Appeal, in a unanimous decision, affirmed the judgment of the trial High Court in favour of the plaintiff/respondent/respondent against the defendant/appellant/appellant in this land matter. In the said judgment, the trial High Court dismissed appellant’s counter-claim, which was also affirmed by the Court of Appeal. Aggrieved by the concurrent judgment of the Court of Appeal, the defendant/appellant/appellant has brought this appeal before us, praying for the reversal of same on the following grounds: 1. The Court of Appeal erred in coming to a conclusion that the identity, extent and size of the land, the subject-matter, was not in issue as same was one of agreed fact. 2. The Court erred by holding that Exhibit ‘B’, which is the judgment in the case of AMEODA v PORDIER and AMEODA v FORZI & Ors [1967] GLR 479; C.A., is binding on the defendant and operated as Estoppel per rem judicatam. 3. The Judgment was against the weight of evidence. For the ...