GODWIN DAH vs. ELO KUDZO & ANOR

JUDGMENT By his writ of summons dated 18 July 2019 the Plaintiff claims against the Defendants the following reliefs : a. Declaration that the structure complained of is a nuisance, a trespass to Plaintiff’s lands and an infringement onto Plaintiff’s easement of road and light. b. An order directed at the 2nd defendant to remove the said structure. c. Costs including Solicitor’s fee. Upon service of the Plaintiff’s writ of summons and statement of claim on the defendants, both entered appearance separately through their respective lawyers. The 1st defendant subsequently filed a defence, but the 2nd defendant did not. The 1st defendant denied the claim of the Plaintiff and counter claimed as follows: A declaration that the 1st Defendant and his lawful wife Doris Dah are the owners of the disputed land situate, lying and being at Gbi-Bla which land is bounded as follows: 1. On one side by an access road 2. On another side by the vendor’s land 3. On yet another side b...