[1961]DLHC5399 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:center; mso-pagination:none;tab-stops:center 3.25in left 396.75pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"; color:#548DD4">IN RE DUMOGA AND 12 OTHERS<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:center; mso-pagination:none;tab-stops:center 3.25in left 396.75pt"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"; color:#548DD4"> </span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">[HIGH COURT, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:center; mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">[1961] GLR 44<a name="_gjdgxs"></a> </span></b><i><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">DATE:</span></i><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"; color:#00B0F0"> </span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">9TH JANUARY, 1961.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt; mso-border-shadow:yes"><b><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">COUNSEL: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;tab-stops:104.25pt;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid black 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">DR. J. B. DANQUAH FOR APPLICANTS.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;tab-stops:104.25pt;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid black 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">A. N. E. AMISSAH FOR RESPONDENTS.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt; mso-border-shadow:yes"><b><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">CORAM: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:6.0pt;text-align:justify;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid black 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><b><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">ADUMUA-BOSSMAN, J.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:justify;mso-pagination: none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow: yes"><b><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:justify;mso-pagination: none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow: yes"><b><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">JUDGMENT OF ADUMUA-BOSSMAN J.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:justify;mso-pagination: none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow: yes"><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">As permitted by Order 59, rule 9 of the Supreme Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 1954, which provides that:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt; margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-padding-alt: 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes"><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;"> “An application for a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum shall be made to a Judge in Court, except that:— <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt; margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-padding-alt: 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes"><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">(a) in vacation or at any time when no Judge is sitting in Court it may be made to a Judge sitting otherwise than in Court;” an application in the form of a motion was filed for consideration of hearing “Coram Mr. Justice K. A. Bossman” by counsel Dr. J. B. Danquah on behalf of Emmanuel Obed Kofi Dumoga and twelve others of the Volta Region, for an order for writs of habeas corpus to issue, directed to the Minister of the Interior and the Director of Prisons, both of Accra, to show cause why the said Emmanuel Obed Kofi Dumoga and twelve others now detained in James Fort Prison, Accra, should not be released from their detention to which they were subjected under an order made by Lord Listowel, Governor-General, on the 14th day of March, 1960, under Preventive Detention Order, E.I. 69/1960 and Preventive Detention (No. 2) Order, E.I. 70/1960 and/or for any other order or orders as to the judge may seem meet, and for bail.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:justify;mso-pagination: none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow: yes"><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:justify;mso-pagination: none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow: yes"><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">The motion was supported by an affidavit which disclosed that the applicants were thirteen out of fourteen persons who were arrested on the 14th March, 1960, and were being detained under the executive instruments or orders specified in the motion paper as well as the affidavit, which were issued under section 2 of the Preventive Detention Act, 1958 and were duly gazetted. (See Supplement to Gazette No. 26 dated the 19th March, 1960, at p.70). Copies of the said orders were annexed as exhibits A2 and A3 to the affidavit. The affidavit further disclosed that following the arrest of the applicants on the 14th March, 1960 they were on the 18th March, 1960, duly served with the grounds of detention, a copy whereof was also annexed to the affidavit as exhibit A1.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:justify;mso-pagination: none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow: yes"><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">The affidavit then proceeded to set out in succeeding paragraphs how the applicants, in spite of the difficulties and hardships occasioned by their detention, were able to prepare and to supply to Dr. Danquah, their solicitor, material, mainly in the form of written statements and other forms of information, whereby he was able to prepare and submit a petition on their behalf to the Governor-General, by way of denying and/ or repudiating the acts prejudicial to the security of the state which had been attributed to them; secondly, of giving such explanations as they had, severally and collectively, of the acts attributed to them, and finally praying for their release from detention. A copy of the petition was also annexed to the affidavit as exhibit D. The affidavit then went on to complain at some length in further succeeding paragraphs, that as from the 29th June, 1960, when the petition was presented to the Governor-General, and a copy supplied to the Minister of the Interior, in spite of several letters sent on behalf of the applicants enquiring about a reply, no reply was received nor was any action taken towards the release of the applicants, wherefore they had been obliged after being in detention for about seven months to make this application to the court. The affidavit did not, however, conclude with that paragraph—the tenth paragraph—explaining how the applicants had been obliged to resort to the court.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:justify;mso-pagination: none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow: yes"><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:justify;mso-pagination: none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow: yes"><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">It continued with various other allegations contained in 21 further paragraphs, so that the total number of paragraphs was 31 in all. These other allegations included repetitions of the denials and/or repudiations of the charges in the grounds of detention served on the applicants and explanations as to some of those acts, as already set out in the petition, exhibit B, with additions. These denials and explanations as to the charges in the grounds were followed by allegations in a number of paragraphs of the affidavit, the substance of which was that the Governor-General had been grossly misled by political antagonists of the applicants who entertained considerable malice against them to make the orders resulting in their arrest and detention; and that in fact, some of these political opponents, who were high-ranking agents of the government and whose names were mentioned in the petition as well as the affidavit, had threatened some of the applicants with arrest and detention shortly before the applicants were actually arrested under the executive instruments. Then there followed allegations that such emergency, if any, as the Governor-General was apprehensive of and to take prec