[1963]DLSC1998 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p> </p><p align="center" style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; text-align: center;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: rgb(84, 141, 212); line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">BAIDEN </span></b></p><p> </p><p align="center" style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; text-align: center;"><a name="_gjdgxs"></a><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: rgb(84, 141, 212); line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">vs. </span></b></p><p> </p><p align="center" style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; text-align: center;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: rgb(84, 141, 212); line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">SOLOMON </span></b></p><p> </p><p align="center" style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; text-align: center;"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 10pt;">[SUPREME COURT]</span></p><p> </p><p align="center" style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; text-align: center;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 10pt;">[1963] 1 GLR 488</span></b></p><p> </p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.5pt; padding:31.0pt 31.0pt 1.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes"> <p align="right" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0in; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: right;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 10pt;">DATE:</span></i><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: rgb(0, 176, 240); line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 10pt;"> </span></b><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 10pt;">29TH MAY, 1963</span><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">.</span></p> </div><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px; border: medium; border-image: none;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">COUNSEL:<span style="margin: 0px;"> </span></span></b></p><p> </p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"> <p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0in; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><span style="margin: 0px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">C. CANN FOR THE APPELLANT.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0in; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><span style="margin: 0px; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">B. J. DA ROCHA FOR THE RESPONDENT.</span></p> </div><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px; border: medium; border-image: none;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">CORAM: </span></b></p><p> </p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"> <p style="margin: 0px 0px 8px; padding: 0in; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">CRABBE, OLLENNU AND AKUFO-ADDO JJ.S.C.</span></b></p> </div><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;"> </span></b></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">JUDGMENT OF CRABBE J.S.C.</span></b></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">This is an appeal from the judgment of Charles J.1 whereby he awarded to the plaintiff the sum of £G2,300 as compensation to the dependants of Theresa Jona Solomon (deceased) who died as a result of the negligent driving of the defendant.</span></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">In his writ of summons the plaintiff, as the administrator of the estate of Theresa Jona Solomon (deceased), claimed from the defendant the sum of £G4,212 for the negligence resulting in the death of the deceased. The statement of claim filed amplified the negligence alleged and then set out the basis of the claim in the following paragraphs:</span></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px 48px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">“4. The action is brought on behalf of the plaintiff, and on behalf of the following dependants.</span></i></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px 48px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">(a) Josephine Solomon, born on the 9th January, 1955; (b) Emmanuel Solomon, born on the 10th June, 1957; (c) Patrick L. Kobina Solomon, born on the 22nd July, 1958. 5. The said Theresa Jona Solomon was immediately prior to the said accident, aged 28 years, and was employed as a school teacher by the Catholic Educational Unit, at a salary of £G295 per annum. She was the sole support of the aforementioned dependants who by her death have lost such support. PARTICULARS OF SPECIAL DAMAGES (a) Funeral expenses incurred £G82 (b) Damages for the said dependants for 14 years loss of salary at £G295 per annum £G4,130 (c) Total damages claimed £G4,212”</span></i></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">Although the Fatal Accidents Act, 1846,2 of the United Kingdom as amended by the Law Reform (Civil Wrongs) Act, 1959,3 of Ghana was not pleaded there can be no doubt on the face of the pleadings that this action was brought under section 3 (1) (b) of the latter enactment.</span></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">The notice of appeal originally filed contained the following grounds:</span></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px 48px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">“(a) that the learned trial judge was wrong in refusing defendant-appellant to adduce evidence in disclaiming liability. </span></i></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px 48px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">(b) that the learned trial judge erred in holding that the defendant-appellant counsel’s open pronouncement in court for a settlement without prejudice amounted to an estoppel or admission of negligence on the part of the defendant. </span></i></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px 48px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">(c) that the learned trial judge misdirected himself as to the legal effect of the words ‘without prejudice.’ </span></i></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px 48px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">(d) that the damages awarded were too excessive.”</span></i></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">On the first day of the hearing of the appeal counsel for the appellant asked the leave of the court to argue an additional ground of appeal contained in a notice which had been filed shortly before the court sat that morning. This ground was stated in these terms: “That the record of proceedings is inaccurate and or deficient in respect of material particulars.” To this notice was attached an affidavit sworn to by the appellant verifying this so-called ground of appeal. Strictly this is no ground of appeal at all, but in view of the pertinacity of counsel and in order to clarify certain features of the proceedings which had aroused the suspicion of the court, the court decided to be over indulgent to the appellant and it accordingly granted leave for this unusual ground to be argued.</span></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">This additional ground was argued first, but before dealing with it on the merits it is necessary to set out the sequence of events from the 18th January, 1962. On that date Charles J. adjourned the case to the 13th February, 1962, “for hearing” without giving any reasons for such adjournment. On the 13th February, 1962, the learned judge made the following minutes:</span></p><p> </p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6.66px 48px; border: medium; border-image: none; text-align: justify;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"><span style="margin: 0px; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: Quattrocento; font-size: 12pt;">“Mr. R. S. Blay appears for the plaintiff. Mr. Cann appears for the defendant. Mr. Cann informs court that he has got in touch with the Northern Assurance C