[1968]DLCA9289 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;color:#00B0F0">IN RE KWANTSIWAH (CAVEATRIX); KWANTSIWAH<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua";color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoBodyText" align="center" style="margin-bottom:6.0pt;text-align:center; line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0">EFFIRIM-BOTCHEY AND ANOTHER<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi">[COURT OF APPEAL,<span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt"> </span>ACCRA]<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm; mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi">[</span></b><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">1968</span></b><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi">] GLR 1114 </span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi"> <b> </b> DATE: 16<sup>TH </sup>DECEMBER, 1968<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:115%;mso-pagination:widow-orphan; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi">COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">J. ARTHUR FOR THE APPELLANT.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm; mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">A. FORSON FOR THE RESPONDENT.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:115%;mso-pagination:widow-orphan; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">CORAM:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:115%;mso-pagination:widow-orphan; text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">AKUFO-ADDO C.J., OLLENNU J.A, AMISSAH J.A</span><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm; mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><h2 style="margin-top:.05pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left: 0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">JUDGMENT OF OLLENNU J.A.<o:p></o:p></span></h2><p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin-top:6.45pt;margin-right:5.75pt;margin-bottom: 0cm;margin-left:5.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height: 115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">This appeal is from an order of the High Court, Sekondi, removing a caveat entered by the appellant against a marriage intended to be celebrated under the Marriage Ordinance, Cap. 127 (1951 Rev.), in the Methodist Church, Sekondi, between the respondent and one Madam Beatrice Mensah. The caveat was entered in pursuance of section 24(1) (a) of the Marriage Ordinance, Cap. 127 (1951 Rev.), by notice served upon the superintendent minister of the church. The grounds of her objection to the marriage are contained in an affidavit sworn to by the caveatrix on 4 April 1966, a copy of which was served upon the respondent.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin-top:6.35pt;margin-right:5.85pt;margin-bottom: 0cm;margin-left:5.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height: 115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">Section 25 (1) of the Ordinance provides that whenever a caveat is entered, the marriage officer, in this case the superintendent minister of the Methodist Church, Sekondi, “shall without delay refer the matter to a Judge.” It is not clear on the record how the caveat came to the notice of the court. However the endorsements on the affidavit of the caveatrix show that a copy of it was to be served upon the superintendent minister of the Sekondi circuit of the Methodist Church, and copy of it upon the registrar of the High Court. On 3 May 1966, the respondent filed in the High Court, an affidavit sworn to by him on the same day, in opposition to the caveat. On the same 3 May 1966, the High Court, acting in pursuance of section 25(3) of the Ordinance, issued summons upon the parties to the intended marriage and upon the caveatrix, the appellant, to appear on 5 May 1966, and calling upon the caveatrix to show cause why the marriage should not<span style="letter-spacing: -.05pt"> </span>proceed.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin-top:6.35pt;text-align:justify;line-height: 115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">In his return of service, the bailiff stated that he was unsuccessful in effecting service upon the caveatrix, and that he was told by an inmate of her house at Apam that she had travelled and it was not known when she would return. Upon the case being called, the learned judge removed the caveat, and said: “It is strange that the caveatrix has not found it fit to prosecute her caveat. If she were keen she would have followed it up. I removed the caveat.”<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin-top:6.15pt;text-align:justify;line-height: 115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">Two grounds of appeal were filed, and were argued together they are:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:2.7pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm; margin-left:33.3pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">“(a) That the learned judge was wrong in removing the caveat without hearing both parties.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:4.7pt;margin-right:5.85pt;margin-bottom: 0cm;margin-left:61.65pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify;text-indent: -28.4pt;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">(b) The learned judge having been made aware that the caveatrix had not been served with a hearing notice he ought not to have heard the case. The hearing was therefore a<span style="letter-spacing: .1pt"> </span>nullity.”<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin-top:8.05pt;text-align:justify;line-height: 115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">Section 25(2) and (3) of the Marriage Ordinance, Cap, 127, provide that:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:2.65pt;margin-right:5.8pt;margin-bottom: 0cm;margin-left:61.65pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify;text-indent: -28.4pt;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">“(2) If a Judge is of opinion that no legal ground has been disclosed in the caveat for forbidding the issue of the certificate, he may remove the caveat in manner hereinafter prescribed without requiring a