SAMSON KWAME TETTEH AND TECHNICAL EXAMINATIONS UNIT [2001]DLCHRAJ5901

Date	2001-05-30
Suit No.	Our Ref: CHRAJ/1202/2001/1968
Citation No.	[2001]DLCHRAJ5901

CHRIS AKUFF-OPOKU

[2001]DLCHRAJ5901
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" ><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:
115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;color:#00B050">SAMSON KWAME TETTEH <o:p></o:p>(COMPLAINANT)<o:p></o:p>AND<o:p></o:p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:
115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;color:#00B050">TECHNICAL EXAMINATIONS UNIT <o:p></o:p>(RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:center;
mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">(CHRAJ)<o:p></o:p>

Our Ref: CHRAJ/1202/2001/1968&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; DATE: 30/05/2001<o:p></o:p>

</div>commissioner:<o:p></o:p>CHRIS
AKUFF-OPOKU DEPUTY CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER FOR COMMISSIONER<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:center;
mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">DECISION<o:p></o:p>

</div>INTRUDUCTION:<o:p></o:p>In
a complaint dated 22nd February 2001, the Complainant petitioned this
Commission to have his examination scripts remarked.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>COMPLAINANT'S CASE:<o:p></o:p>The Complainant stated that in May/July
2000, he too' an examination with the Respondent Unit.<o:p></o:p>However,
before the exam be claimed he was attached and injured by armed rubbers. <o:p></o:p>He
asserted that at the time of his exam, he had pain in his hand which prevented
him from writing legibly. As a result, that contributed to his failure in his
exam.<o:p></o:p>He
further appealed to the Commission to get his papers re-marked.<o:p></o:p>After careful consideration of the
complaint, the Commission observes that the Complainant has shown no proof that
he reported this matter to the Respondent. If this had beer reported, the
Respondent may have taken the appropriate steps under the circumstances. He
cannot keep silent and write his exam and then complain after he had failed.<o:p></o:p>Furthermore,
the Complainant admits that his handwriting was bad and contributed to his
failure. The question is, if the examiners could not decipher his handwriting
initially, what good would a remarking do? It is after all the same illegible
hand writing which would be presented for remarking.<o:p></o:p>"In
view of this, the Commission exercises its discretion to cease investigations
as the<o:p></o:p>

Complaint
lacks merit.<o:p></o:p></main>