HASSAN vs. INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION [2001]DLHC1190

Date	2001-12-04
Suit No.
Citation No.	[2001]DLHC1190

KUSI-APPOUH J

M DZOKOTO FOR S OKUDZETO FOR THE PLAINTIFFS.

KEN SENAYA FOR S A X TSEGAH FOR THE FIRST DEFENDANT.

DICK K ANYADI FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD DEFENDANTS.

[2001]DLHC1190
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" ><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
color:#00B0F0">HASSAN<o:p></o:p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
color:#00B0F0">INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION<o:p></o:p>[HIGH
COURT, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p>[2001-2002]
2 GLR 214<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="right" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:right;
mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">Date: 4 DECEMBER 2001<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p>M
DZOKOTO FOR S OKUDZETO FOR THE PLAINTIFFS.<o:p></o:p>KEN
SENAYA FOR S A X TSEGAH FOR THE FIRST DEFENDANT.<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

DICK
K ANYADI FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD DEFENDANTS. <o:p></o:p>

</div>JUDGEMENT<o:p></o:p>Kusi-Appouh J. <o:p></o:p>On
29 October 1999 the plaintiffs herein issued out a writ against the defendants
herein for the following reliefs:<o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt;
margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:
31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes">“(a)
A declaration that neither the 1991 nor 1995 constitution, rules and bye-laws
or the first defendant is of any legal effect, same, not having been registered
in violation of law. <o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt;
margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:
31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes">(b)
An order declaring as illegal and nullifying the several acts specified under
paragraph (10) of Plaintiff’s accompanying statement of claim. <o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt;
margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:
31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes">(c)
An order restraining the defendant from using either the said 1991 or 1995
constitution, rules and bye-laws in running and conducting the affairs of the
first defendant, until same have been duly registered in accordance with law. <o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt;
margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:
31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes">(d)
Further orders.”<o:p></o:p>On
18 January 2000 the plaintiff herein amended the indorsement on the writ of
summons by adding the following reliefs after the court had granted his motion
for leave to amend the said indorsement and pleadings under Order 2b, r 1 and 6
of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 1954 (LN 140A).<o:p></o:p>The
additional reliefs and the amendment of the pleadings were as follows, namely:<o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt;
margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:
31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes">“1
(e) An order restraining the second and third defendants herein from holding
themselves out and acting as the national chairman and general secretary
respectively of the first defendant-union. <o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt;
margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:
31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes">