[2004]DLCA6477 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">GODFRED OCANSEY<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">THE REPUBLIC<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(DEFENDANTS)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">[COURT OF APPEAL, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CIVIL APPEAL NO. 26/2002 DATE: 4<sup>TH</sup> MARCH, 2004<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt; border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none; padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;border:none;mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding: 0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;border:none;mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding: 0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> MOHAMMED ATTAH ESQ FOR THE APPELLANT <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;border:none;mso-border-top-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding: 0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:Symbol;mso-ascii-font-family:"Book Antiqua"; mso-hansi-font-family:"Book Antiqua";mso-char-type:symbol;mso-symbol-font-family: Symbol"> </span><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">PENELOPE-ANN MAMATTA CHIEF STATE ATTORNEY, FOR THE RESPONDENT<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CORAM: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">APALOO JA (PRESIDING), MARFUL SAU JA, ACQUAYE JA<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt; border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none; padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;border:none; mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">APALOO JA <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">In this appeal, the appellant Godfred Ocansey is seeking the reversal of his conviction by the High Court Accra dated 30/4/2009. The High Court upon conviction sentenced the appellant to a term of 7 years IHL in respect of Count 1 and for Count 2 he was to serve 3 years IHL. Both sentences were to run concurrently. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The appellant had been charged with the offences of defilement contrary to section 101 of the Criminal Offences Act 1960, Act 29 and incest contrary to section 105 of the same Act.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> Briefly stated the case of the Prosecution was that the appellant is and was at all material time the father of Edna Ocansey who was aged 17 at the commencement of the trial. According to the Prosecution between the years 2000-2003, appellant had sexual intercourse with his daughter Edna several times when she was below the age of 16 years. Appellant was able to convince Edna that as a father he had the right to have sex with her and so she should not tell anybody. Appellant then continued to make sexual demands on his daughter until June 2007 when she rebelled. Her refusal attracted severe beatings from the appellant. He also prevented her from going out of the house alone and also going to her mother’s family house.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> It was the Prosecution’s case further that in March 2007, Edna accompanied her mother to a party organized by her aunt and this infuriated the appellant so much that he beat her up mercilessly for going out of the house. Edna threatened to tell her mother the truth which statement attracted further beatings. The mother went to the scene but she was also beaten mercilessly by the appellant and was taken to hospital. Edna later confided in her mother with the details of her father’s sexual conduct.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> It was alleged that upon confrontation with the truth appellant confessed to it and agreed during a family attempted settlement to pacify both the wife’s family and his to avoid any calamity descending on the families. Appellant however reneged on the terms of the agreement which resulted in a family feud. On. June 17th, 2007 Edna proceeded to the Tema Regional Police to lodge a complaint and after investigations the appellant was charged with the offences.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> The appellant by his petition of appeal filed 6 grounds of appeal to wit; <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in; mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">1.<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></i><!--[endif]--><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">That the judgment is against the weight of the evidence on record.<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in; mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">2.<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></i><!--[endif]--><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">There were serious conflicts and discrepancies in the evidence of the prosecution on material issues which affected the credibility of the witnesses which the trial judge failed to consider, which resulted in a substantial miscarriage of justice against the accused. <o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in; mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">3.<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></i><!--[endif]--><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">That the trial judge made wrong findings of fact from the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and relied on same and convicted the appellant which resulted in a substantial miscarriage of justice.<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in; mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">4.<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></i><!--[endif]--><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">That the trial judge failed to appraise the defence put up by the appellant as to whether his defence raised reasonable doubts as to his guilt and thereby convicted the appellant which resulted in a substantial miscarriage of justice. <o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in; mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><i