IBRAHIM vs. THE REPUBLIC [2004]DLCA980

Date	2004-07-22
Suit No.
Citation No.	[2004]DLCA980

ANSAH JA

ASIAMAH JA

ANIN-YEBOAH JA

ROBERT DASSAH FOR YONNY KULENDI FOR THE APPELLANT.

MRS MERLEY WOOD (PRINCIPAL STATE ATTORNEY) FOR THE RESPONDENT.

[2004]DLCA980
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" ><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
color:#00B0F0">IBRAHIM<o:p></o:p><a name="_gjdgxs"></a><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
color:#00B0F0">THE REPUBLIC<o:p></o:p>[COURT
OF APPEAL, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p>[2003-2005]
1 GLR 562<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

</div>COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p>ROBERT
DASSAH FOR YONNY KULENDI FOR THE APPELLANT.<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

MRS
MERLEY WOOD (PRINCIPAL STATE ATTORNEY) FOR THE RESPONDENT. <o:p></o:p>

ANSAH,
ASIAMAH AND ANIN-YEBOAH JJA<o:p></o:p>

</div>JUDGEMENT<o:p></o:p>Asiamah JA <o:p></o:p>Delivered
the first judgment at the invitation of Ansah JA. The appellant was tried on a
charge of murder and was convicted by a seven-member jury on 28 July 1999 and
sentenced by the trial High Court, Kumasi to suffer death. The committal
hearing was, however, conducted at the Circuit Court, Wa in the Upper West
Region.<o:p></o:p>In
his notice of appeal filed on the very day of his conviction and sentence, the
appellant put forth the following grounds:<o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-add-space:auto;
text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in;mso-pagination:none;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2;
border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes">(1). “That the trial judge erred
by depending heavily on the statutory statement which was not an evidence on
oath. <o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-add-space:auto;
text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in;mso-pagination:none;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2;
border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes">(2). That the trial judge
misdirected the jury by non-direction as to the weight to be attached to the
evidence of the second prosecution witness who together with the victim and
other people assaulted the appellant. <o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-add-space:auto;
text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in;mso-pagination:none;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2;
border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes">(3). That the verdict of the jury
was unreasonable and unsupported by evidence in view of the serious conflicts
and discrepancies which ought to put the jury on their guard as to the
credibility and accuracy of the prosecution witnesses. <o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left:.5in;mso-add-space:auto;
text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in;mso-pagination:none;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2;
border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;mso-border-shadow:yes">(4). That the trial judge failed to
direct adequately on the duty of the jury if they entertained reasonable doubt
after considering the explanation of the appellant. <o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:
5.0pt;margin-left:.5in;mso-add-space:auto;text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in;
mso-pagination:none;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;
mso-border-shadow:yes">(5).