NATASHA GERTRUDE COFIE ATTAH AND VISION 2000 ASSOCIATES LTD. [2004]DLCHRAJ5931

Date	2004-09-14
Suit No.	Our Ref: CHRAJ/1575/2001/326
Citation No.	[2004]DLCHRAJ5931

D.K. OFOSU QUARTEY

[2004]DLCHRAJ5931
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >NATASHA
GERTRUDE COFIE ATTAH<o:p></o:p>(COMPLAINANT)<o:p></o:p>AND<o:p></o:p>VISION 2000
ASSOCIATES LTD.<o:p></o:p>(RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p>(CHRAJ)<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:center;
line-height:normal;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">Our
Ref: CHRAJ/1575/2001/326&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 14/09/2004<o:p></o:p>

</div>INTRODUCTION<o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:
1.25pt;line-height:normal;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;
mso-border-shadow:yes">The
Complainant lodged this complaint dated 19th June 2001 against the Respondent for
refusing to pay the Complainant the sum of £1,000,000 being the Complainant's
net salary.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>COMPLAINANT'S CASE<o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:
.25pt;line-height:normal;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;
mso-border-shadow:yes">The
Complainant was employed as a desk receptionist by the Respondent in 29th
January 2001. The Complainant alleged that in the appointment letter issued by
the Respondent, it was stated that a monthly salary of £250,000.00 and ¢15,000.00
per night duty allowance would be paid to the Complainant. The Complainant
further alleged that the Respondent never paid her salary for 3 months and all
efforts to retrieve the sum of £1,000,000.00 being her net salary including her
night duty allowance had proved futile.<o:p></o:p>Pursuant
to C.I. 7 Section 3(1) of the Enabling Act 456, a copy of the complaint was
served on the Respondent to comment thereon, but received no response.<o:p></o:p>The
Commission invited the Complainant for further discussion on same, but the
Complainant never turned up. A reminder/final invitation to the Complainant to
state her preparedness to pursue the case also never yielded any response.<o:p></o:p>The
Commission exercises its discretion in line with Section 13(2)(b) of Act 456 to
refuse any further investigation since the Complainant does not have sufficient
personal interest in the subject matter of the complaint.<o:p></o:p>The
complaint is struck out.<o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:
1.4pt;line-height:normal;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;
mso-border-shadow:yes"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:
1.4pt;line-height:normal;mso-pagination:none;border:none;mso-padding-alt:31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt 31.0pt;
mso-border-shadow:yes">