A.NARTEY TOKOLI & ORS vs. VALCO LIMITED [2006]DLCA5477

Date	2006-05-23
Suit No.	CIVIL APPEAL SUIT NO. H3/414/2005
Citation No.	[2006]DLCA5477

GBADEGBE J.A. (PRESIDING)

OSEI J.A.

ANIM J. J.A.

MR. PHILIP ………….. FOR THE ………………… APPLICANTS.

MR. GEORGE THOMPSON FOR THE ……………. RESPONDENT

[2006]DLCA5477
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >A.NARTEY TOKOLI &amp; ORS<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>VALCO LIMITED<o:p></o:p>[COURT OF
APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION), ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

CIVIL APPEAL SUIT NO. H3/414/2005&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 23RD MAY, 2006<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p>MR.
PHILIP ………….. FOR THE ………………… APPLICANTS.<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

</div>CORAM:&nbsp; <o:p></o:p>GBADEGBE&nbsp;&nbsp; J.A. (PRESIDING), OSEI&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; J.A., ANIM J. J.A.<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;
padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%;
border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:
solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p>

</div>Counsel
for the applicants of …………….. notice of motion for review on arguments contained
in the said process as well as the ……………………………… affidavit says that the Respondent
has filed an affidavit in ……………………<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>Turn to
rule 34 of C1 19 - the enabling legislations of the court rules states that “there
are exceptional circumstances shown by the application and that in the interest
of justice these should be a review of the decision of the court dated
27/01/05.&nbsp; …………. of the appeal that were disposed
of and the demand by the applicants for a variation of the judgment of ………………….
appeal.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>………………………..:
Counsel did you file a notice for …………………. of the judgment under rule 15(1) of
C1 19?<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>My Lord,
we had ………………… appeal …………………… with a notice for …………………… of the filed it
together with the statement of ……………………………………… of the ……………… 7 &amp; 8 of the
affidavit&nbsp; of …………………………… filed on
6/06/2005 in support of the application. ……… to page 17 of the judgment in
…………………………….. to ……………………… page 17 line 4 “…………………………………. the Supreme Court
Order”<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>Thus the
conclusion above of the ………………….. to them and to ……………. should have had an
amend made in their favour regarding it.&nbsp;
…….. page 20 of the judgment - page 4 line 3.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>That ………
also demonstrates that the applicants were “……………. unless they were entitled to
benefits (all) that those at work enjoyed but the judgment did not cater for
their need of deprivation and loss.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>The
……………… to the non-award of interest of the order of the court – Court of Appeal
that the amend was limited to only the monetary awards reliefs, those benefits
that were converted into cash were not so …………………….<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>Also to
page 22 of the statement of case - ……………………… (d) – on payment points
earned.&nbsp; That ……………… was common agreement
so their ……………. in the trial court by the parties to the appeal.&nbsp; <o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>……………………………..
Counsel you ……………… of us to rule 34 of C1 19, ………………….. our reference to the
……………………………….. concerning …………………. of the case.&nbsp;
Article 137(3) does so.&nbsp; (1992
Constitution).<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>Counsel
for the Respondent now refers to the affidavit in …………………………………&nbsp; ……………… rule 34 of C1 19 – Court of Appeal
Rules – exceptional circumstances and interest of justice.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;">(1)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
&nbsp;Foreliene V. Reecone (1987-88) 2 GCR 105 <o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;">(2)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;