[2008]DLCA6553 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">OKYEAME YIMA, TEYE TIMOTHY DOKU AND MRS. CHRISTIANA EDITH</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0"> <b>AGYAKWA<i><o:p></o:p></i></b></span></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">(</span></i></b><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif"">PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS<b>)<o:p></o:p></b></span></i></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">MAJOR KEELSON (RTD)<i><o:p></o:p></i></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;text-align:center; line-height:115%"><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(DEFENDANT/APPELLANT)</span></i><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;"><o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">[</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COURT OF APPEAL, ACCRA</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">]</span><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">SUIT NO. NO. H1/282/04 </span></b><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;"> </span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">DATE: </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">3RD APRIL, 2008<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COUNSEL: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS– MR. ASANTE ANSONG <o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">DEFENDANT/APPELLANT – MR. S. K. AKOTO<b> <o:p></o:p></b></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CORAM: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: 115%;mso-outline-level:1;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">ARYEETEY J.A. (PRESIDING), MARFUL SAU J.A., MARIAMA OWUSU J.A.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: 115%;mso-outline-level:1"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;line-height:115%;mso-outline-level:1;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">ARYEETEY, J.A. <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">These two consolidated cases, which were marked as SUIT NO. L. 81/92 and SUIT NO. L 20/92 respectively in the court below, have a common origin. Both of them undisputedly have their roots in the land acquired by a purchasing syndicate by name Agyakwa and Company, whose leader was the late Odikro Kwabena Agyakwa of Begoro and Mampong-Akwapim, from the Akim Aboakwa and Begoro stools. Specifically the two consolidated cases supposedly relate to the portion of that land that was allotted to the late Odikro Agyakwa after the purchase. In respect of Suit No. L 81/92 the plaintiff’s position is that she and his late brother Dr. Samuel Nyako Agyakwa were two of the children of their late father Odikro Kwabena Agyakwa brought the action on their own behalf and on behalf of their brothers and sisters. In the course of the litigation in the court below Dr. Samuel Agyako, the first plaintiff died. Rather than applying to the court for substitution of her late brother, Christiana Edith Agyakwa Aboa who was originally the second plaintiff applied for the name of his late brother to be struct out as a party. Her stand is that in or about 1924 her late father, Odikro Kwabena Agyakwa as leader of a group which they called Agyakwa and Company purchased the land from Akim Abuakwa and Begoro Stools. Members of the group shared the purchased land. Odikro Kwabena Agyakwa sold part of his share to certain Krobos who were led by one Kwesi Ghartey alias W. D. Ghartey, the predecessor of the defendant/appellant. Kwesi Ghartey was also known as Kwesi Photo or Photo Kwesi. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">After Odikro Kwabena Agyakwa had disposed of part of his land he kept the remainder which is described under SCHEDULE A and SCHEDULE B endorsed on the writ of summons for himself. The descriptions under the said SCHEDULE A is as follows: “ALL THAT PIECE OR PARCEL OF LAND situate lying and being at Akwamu Kotoku (Miaso) near Begoro in the Eastern Region of the Republic of Ghana and bounded on the North by property of Kwaku Larbi & Co., on the South by Charles Odame’s property, on the East by Tetteh Kwaku Adjiwo’s property and on the West by property of Kwesi Ghartey alias W. D. Ghartey and Otieku & Co.” Under SCHEDULE B we have “ALL THAT PIECE OR PARCEL OF LAND situate lying and being at Akwamu Kotoku aforesaid and bounded on the North by property of Kweku Larbi & Co., on the South by River Mia, on the East by property of Kwesi Ghartey alias W. D. Ghartey and Otieku & Co. and on the West by River Mia.” On 24th August 1951 Odikro Agyakwa granted the two parcels of land described in SCHEDULE A and SCHEDULE B to his children by way of customary gift. Following the death of Kwesi Ghartey the defendant, his nephew succeeded him. When the defendant came to occupy his uncle’s land he persistently trespassed on the plaintiff’s lands, farming on the said lands, re-demarcating them, collecting proceeds of farms cultivated by the plaintiffs agents, collecting rents from the plaintiff’s tenants and appropriating the proceeds to his own use. The plaintiff therefore claims the following reliefs: (a) Declaration of Title to the parcels of land described in SCHEDULE A and SCHEDULE B. (b) Damages for Trespass, (c) An order for Recovery of Possession, (d) An order for Account, (e) An Order for Perpetual Injunction. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">According to the defendant’s amended pleading in respect of Suit No. L 81/92, in 1948 his late uncle W. D. Ghartey purchased a large track of forest land of about 1052.50 acres from Odikro Kwabena Agyakwa for an amount of £2688 in his personal capacity. He gave the boundaries of his late uncle’s land as follows: It is bounded on one side by the property of Adjaweh & Co., and on another side by the property of Agyakwa & Co., on the third side by the Mia River and on another side by the property of Kwaku Larbi & Co. (which was later purchased and owned by W. D. Ghartey). His late uncle went into possession of the land he purchased from the late Agyakwa. The land, which Agyakwa owned is now occupied by some Krobo farmers. After he had taken over control of his uncle’s land he did not see the plaintiff and her late brother on the land in dispute. He had not come across any agents of the plaintiff farming on the land on her behalf. He had never trespassed on the plaintiff’s land neither had he received any warning, directly or indirectly from the plaintiff in respect of his possession of the land. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-fami