CANADIAN TEXTILE RECYCLING LTD vs NICHOLAS OFOSU MARFO [2010]DLHC16577

Date	2010-02-19
Suit No.	SUIT NO: AC 10/2007
Citation No.	[2010]DLHC16577

HIS LORDSHIP SAMUEL K. A. ASIEDU J.

AMARKAI AMARTEFIO

ALEXANDER ABBAN

[2010]DLHC16577
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >CANADIAN TEXTILE RECYCLING LTD<o:p></o:p>

(PLAINTIFF)<o:p></o:p>

vs.<o:p></o:p>

[HIGH COURT, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p>

&nbsp;

<a name="_heading=h.gjdgxs"></a>SUIT
NO: AC 10/2007&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; DATE: 19TH FEBRUARY
2010<o:p></o:p>

</div>

COUNSEL<o:p></o:p>

AMARKAI AMARTEFIO FOR PLAINTIFF<o:p></o:p>

</div>

HIS LORDSHIP SAMUEL K. A. ASIEDU J. <o:p></o:p>

JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p>

</div>

&nbsp;

By a writ of summons dated
the 17th day of December, 2006 the Plaintiff claims against the
defendant:<o:p></o:p>

&nbsp;

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “(a) An order
against the defendant for an amount of US D 673,766.66 or its &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; cedis &nbsp;&nbsp; equivalent
and interest thereon up to the final date of payment.<o:p></o:p>

&nbsp;

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (b) Costs”<o:p></o:p>

&nbsp;

The writ was accompanied
by a statement of claim which was subsequently amended.&nbsp; After entering appearance to the writ, the
defendant filed a defence and later amended it to include a counterclaim for <o:p></o:p>

&nbsp;

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; “(a) Unpaid
remuneration of&nbsp;&nbsp; USD 805,000
representing 20% of the volume of &nbsp;&nbsp; trade
within the period.<o:p></o:p>

&nbsp;

After the close of
pleadings the following issues were set down by the court for trial:<o:p></o:p>

&nbsp;

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0cm;margin-right:2.1pt;margin-bottom:0cm;
margin-left:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:0cm;
line-height:115%;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt">1)<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-kerning: auto; font-optical-sizing: auto; font-feature-settings: normal; font-variation-settings: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Whether or not the defendant has been
importing goods on credit from the plaintiff and paying for same overtime.<o:p></o:p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0cm;margin-right:2.1pt;margin-bottom:0cm;
margin-left:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:0cm;
line-height:115%;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1;tab-stops:list 36.0pt">2)<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-kerning: auto; font-optical-sizing: auto; font-feature-settings: normal; font-variation-settings: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Whether or not accounts of the two
parties have been audited.<o:p></o:p>