DR. LAWRENCE KANNAE vs PROF. YAW AGYEMAN BADU [2010]DLHC16583

Date	2010-08-25
Suit No.	SUIT NO. AC. 348/2010
Citation No.	[2010]DLHC16583

HIS LORDSHIP SAMUEL K. A. ASIEDU J.

JOE ABOAGYE DEBRAH

ACE ANNAN ANKOMAH

[2010]DLHC16583
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >DR. LAWRENCE
KANNAE<o:p></o:p>(PLAINTIFF)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>PROF. YAW
AGYEMAN BADU<o:p></o:p>(DEFENDANT)<o:p></o:p>[HIGH
COURT, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;<div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: black; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 0.2pt;">

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:
justify;line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid black 1.5pt;
padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><a name="_heading=h.gjdgxs"></a>SUIT NO. AC. 348/2010&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;DATE: 25TH
AUGUST, 2010<o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM<o:p></o:p>HIS LORDSHIP SAMUEL K. A.
ASIEDU J. <o:p></o:p><div style="border-top-width: 1.5pt; border-top-color: black; border-left: none; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: black; border-right: none; padding: 1pt 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 0.2pt;">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:center;line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid black 1.5pt;
mso-border-bottom-alt:solid black 1.5pt;padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">RULING<o:p></o:p>

</div>&nbsp;On
the 1st day of June, 2010 the herein named Plaintiff caused a writ
of summons to issue against the defendant for:<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;“a)&nbsp;&nbsp; A declaration that the plaintiff’s term of
office as Deputy Rector of Gimpa &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; shall
end on July 31, 2011.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;b)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
An order of injunction restraining the defendant, his agents, assigns,
officers &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; and servants from
interference with the plaintiff’s position and performance of his &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; lawful duties as Deputy Rector of GIMPA.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;c)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Costs including legal costs.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;d)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Any other order or orders as may seem just to the Honourable Court”.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;The
writ and the accompanying statement of claim were served on the defendant who caused
his solicitors to enter Appearance. A statement of defence was later filed on
behalf of the defendant.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;After
assessing the indorsement on the plaintiff’s writ of summons and the statement
of claim, the court ordered that the matter be set down for legal argument in
view of the fact that no viva voce evidence would be necessary in the
circumstances of the case.&nbsp; Indeed, Order
33 rule 3 of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2004, CI 47 provides that:<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;