SCANCOM LIMITED vs. VICTOR BANNERMAN-CHEDID [2010]DLHC4304

Date	2010-05-20
Suit No.	SUIT NO. INDL/59/10
Citation No.	[2010]DLHC4304

KWABENA ASUMAN-ADU

MR. NUTIFAFA NUTSUKPUI FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT

MR. CHARLES HAYBOR FOR THE DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT

[2010]DLHC4304
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" ><a name="OLE_LINK1">SCANCOM
LIMITED<o:p></o:p></a>vs.<o:p></o:p>VICTOR BANNERMAN-CHEDID<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;[HIGH COURT (INDUSTRIAL/LABOUR DIVISION),
ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

SUIT NO.
INDL/59/10&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;DATE: 20TH
MAY,
2010 <o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL:&nbsp;&nbsp; <o:p></o:p>MR. NUTIFAFA
NUTSUKPUI FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

MR. CHARLES HAYBOR FOR THE DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
<o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM: <o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

KWABENA
ASUMAN-ADU, JUSTICE
OF THE HIGH COURT<o:p></o:p>

</div><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

RULING<o:p></o:p>

</div>The Plaintiff issued Writ of Summons against the
Defendant on 16th March, 2010 for the following reliefs:<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><ol style="margin-top:0in" start="1" type="1">
 <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:
 115%;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1">“A declaration
 that the Defendant is bound by the provisions of the conditions of
 service, including the provisions which restrain him from taking up
 employment with a competitor of the Plaintiff within one year of leaving
 the Plaintiff’s employment.<o:p></o:p></li>
</ol><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><ol style="margin-top:0in" start="2" type="1">
 <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:
 115%;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1">An order
 directed at the Defendant to respect the provisions of the Conditions of
 Service which restrain the Defendant from taking up employment with any of
 Plaintiff’s competitors including Vodafone within one year of leaving the
 company”.<o:p></o:p></li>
</ol><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>On the same day, the Plaintiff filed motion on
notice for an order of interlocutory injunction to restrain the
Defendant/Respondent from breaching the provisions of the conditions of service
that restrain him from taking up employment with Plaintiff/Applicant’s
competitors, including Vodafone, within one year of leaving the Plaintiff until
final determination of the action. The Defendant/Respondent has opposed the
application. This ruling is, therefore, in respect of the said application.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>The Plaintiff/Applicant’s case is that on or about
the 22nd of April 2008, it made an offer of employment to the
Defendant/Respondent as a Senior Manager responsible for Customer Management,
within the Marketing Division of the company effective the 1st of
June 2008. The Defendant/Respondent accepted the offer of the appointment to
the Plaintiff by signing and returning a copy of the letter of appointment to
the Plaintiff. According to the Plaintiff/Applicant, by signing and returning a
copy of the letter of appointment to the company, the Defendant agreed to be
bound by the conditions of service of the company. By the said conditions of
service, the Defendant accepted that as a management and senior staff of the
company, he would not within a year of leaving the company take up employment
with any of the company’s competitors in order to protect the interest of the
Plaintiff.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>According to the Plaintiff/Applicant, by the nature
of the Defendant/Respondent’s job as the company’s Senior Manager responsible
for Customer Management and also in his capacity as Acting Senior Manager for
Marketing Communications, he had access to the company’s sensitive and
strategic data. Meanwhile, the Defendant/Respondent has resigned from his
position at the company and in breach of the terms of the conditions of
service, he has immediately taken up employment with Vodafone, a
telecommunications company incorporated and operating within the country.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>The Plaintiff/Applicant, therefore, avers that it
will suffer irreparable loss and damage to its interest unless the
Defendant/Respondent is restrained by this Court from taking employment at
Vodafone or any of the Plaintiff’s competitors pending the final determination
of this case.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>