[2011]DLCA5703 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">KOBINA BADU AIKINS<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">[APPELLANT]<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">THE REPUBLIC<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">[RESPONDENT]<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">[COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION), ACCRA]<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.H2/6/2011 DATE: 10<sup>TH</sup> NOVEMBER, 2011<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">J.H. SENOO FOR THE APPELLANT<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">MRS. MARINA APPIAH OPARE PRINCIPAL STATE ATTORNEY FOR THE APPLICANT<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CORAM: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">S. E. KANYOKE JA (PRESIDING), K. N. ADUAMA OSEI (JA), DENNIS D. ADJEI (JA)<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt; border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none; padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">J U D G M E N T<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">DENNIS D. ADJEI (JA)<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">On 29 th July 2010, the High Court, Accra convicted the Appellant for Attempted exportation of Narcotic Drug without License issued by the Minister responsible for Health contrary to Sections 56 (a) and 1(1) of the Narcotic Drugs Control, Enforcement and Sanctions Act. 1990 PNDCL 236 and possession of Narcotic Drug without lawful authority contrary to Section 2(1) of the Narcotic Drugs (Control, Enforcement and Sanctions) Act 1990 PNDCL 236. The appellant was sentenced to ten (10) years IHL on both counts and were to run concurrently.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The brief facts of the case were that the Appellant who was a third year student of Regent University in Accra, went to one Mr. Alexander Ekow Nyankson, Manager of World Express International at the Kotoba International Airport with a box which the appellant alleged contained shear butter to be sent to someone in London. The World Express International is a body which engages in Courier Services. Mr. Alexander Ekow Nyankson, the complainant received the box and examined it.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">During examination, he saw two parcels wrapped with a black polythene bag concealed under an ice-chest and placed in the box. The complainant became suspicious and reported the matter to the Airport Police. The Police arrested the appellant and when the parcel was cut, it was found to contain some compressed dried leaves suspected to be Indian hemp. The dried leaves were sent to the Police Forensic Laboratory for further examination. The dried leaves were tested positive for cannabidiol, cannabinol and tetrahydrocannabinol, all ingredients in cannabis.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">According to the Appellant, it was his friend known as Kit, who gave him the parcel to be sent to someone in London through World Express International without knowing that Cannabis had been concealed in it.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The Appellant being aggrieved with the conviction and sentence filed a notice of appeal at the trial Court to this Court to challenge the basis of his conviction. The Appellant set out five (5) grounds of appeal and they are:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">a) The learned trial Judge erred in refusing to uphold the submission of no case and calling on the accused to open his defence.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">b) The conviction is perverse and against the weight of evidence adduced at the trial.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">c) The trial Judge failed to evaluate the evidence of the accused.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">d) The trial Judge was wrong in his assessment and inference and concluding that the accused had prior knowledge of the existence of the narcotic drug in the parcel and<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">e) The trial Judge erred in his application of the law on knowledge and possession.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">This Court ordered the Appellant to file his written submission and he filed it on 9<sup>th</sup> March 2011. The Attorney General filed his written submission in answer to the Appellant’s written submission on 25 th March, 2011. The Appellant filed a reply to the Attorney General’s answer on 3 rd May, 2011.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The parties argued the case on its merits without noticing the incompetence of the appeal. It is surprising that the Attorney General’s representative could not find that the appeal was filed hopelessly out of time without leave of the trial High Court or this Court and there was no need to write copiously on the merits of the appeal.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The appellant was convicted on 29<sup>th</sup> July, 2010 and the Notice of Appeal was filed on 5<sup>th</sup> October, 2010. The Notice of Appeal is the last but 3 page in the record of appeal. I am making the reference in this manner because the record of appeal is not numbered and it therefore becomes impossible to use pages to make reference to some documents in it.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">Appeals in criminal matters from the High Court or the Regional Tribunal to the Court of Appeal are regulated by the Courts Act 1993 Act 459. Section 11 (6), (7) and (8) of the Courts Act, Act 459 provides thus:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">“(6) Where a party desires to appeal to the Court of Appeal in a criminal case, that party shall give notice of appeal or notice of an application for leave to appeal within one month of the decision appealed against.<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="