[2011]DLHC8202 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;color:#00B0F0">MRS. EMILY ANTO ALIAS EMILE ADDO KUFFOUR AND ANOTHER<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;color:#00B0F0">PROFESSOR FRANCIS ADDO KUFFOUR ALIAS<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;color:#00B0F0">KWASI AGYEBI AND ANOTHER<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;color:#00B0F0"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri">[HIGH COURT, KUMASI</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">]</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri"><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm; mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">SUIT NO. LS 102/97</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif"> DATE: 6<sup>TH</sup> APRIL, 2011<b><o:p></o:p></b></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif">COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">MICHEAL OWUSU FOR APPLICANTS<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">BOAMAH FOR THE CO-DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT <o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">CORAM:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span class="NoSpacingChar"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE JACOB B. BOON</span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><u><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif"><o:p><span style="text-decoration-line: none;"> </span></o:p></span></u></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm; mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">RULING<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif">This is a ruling in respect of a motion by the applicants, namely Nana Addo Kuffour and Vida Kuffour, for an order to substitute them for Nancy Osei Kwaku who was a plaintiff in a suit instituted in this court as far back on 8<sup>th</sup> May, 1997, judgment of which was delivered on 29<sup>th</sup> July, 2010 in favour of the co-defendant for her counter-claim. During the pendency of the suit, the first plaintiff passed away but was not substituted. The judgment was therefore against the surviving second plaintiff who was said to be dissatisfied with the judgment and had instructed her counsel to file an appeal against it. It is instructive to note that the appeal was not filed because she had run out of time. However, on 15/11/10, a motion on notice for extension of time to appeal against the judgment was filed on her behalf. The motion is yet to be heard. Whilst that is pending, the applicants filed the instant motion for an order substituting them for the sole plaintiff to enable them pursue the intended appeal. The reason they assigned for their action is that, they, together with the plaintiff are beneficiaries of the property in dispute in the main suit and they wished to be substituted for the plaintiff to pursue the intended appeal in order to vindicate their interest under the will of their late father.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif">The motion was opposed by the co-defendant. In the affidavit filed on her behalf, it was deposed that the applicants are not parties in the main suit and consequently, do not possess the requisite capacity to pursue any appeal in place of the plaintiff, who is alive, as regards the judgment entered against the said plaintiff; that their motion do not disclose how any right or interest of theirs is derived from the suit, and if they had such a right or interest, it is yet to accrue. In her view, the instant action is an attempt by the applicants to become parties to the action in a circuitous manner. She prayed for the motion to be dismissed as unmeritorious and an abuse of the process.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif">When he moved the motion, counsel for the applicants, who also represented the plaintiff at the hearing of the suit indicated that the writ was a representative one, issued by the plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and their siblings. According to him, the surviving plaintiff has indicated she is no longer interested in pursuing the appeal, and that has necessitated the instant motion by the applicants as the surviving siblings of the plaintiffs.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif">Now, from the endorsement of the writ filed by the plaintiffs on 8/05/97, there is no indication that it was issued by the plaintiffs for themselves and their siblings. The plaintiffs’ first claim was for <b><i>“a declaration that they are joint owners in common with Mrs. Cecilia Campbell also known as Cecilia Akoto alias Afua Adjeiwaa of all that property on plot No. O.T.B. 603, Adum Kumasi, which was devised unto them by the will of their father, John Addo Kuffour (deceased) dated 8<sup>th</sup> day of June, 1957, and probate of which was granted on 27<sup>th</sup> day of June, 1955, by the Supreme Court of the Gold Coast, Kumasi – Ashanti to Francis Addo Kuffour alias Kwasi Agyeibi and John Kofi Darkwa (now deceased) as the named executors of the said will”. </i></b>The second relief was for an order of the court to compel the defendant as the surviving executor of the will of the said John Addo Kuffour to vest the property in the plaintiffs and Mrs. Cecilia Campbell. Mrs. Cecilia Campbell is the co-defendant who had judgment in the suit. The other two reliefs are for orders for accounts and injunction. Nowhere was the slightest indication given by the plaintiffs that they instituted the action for themselves and their siblings. The action had been a long standing one, and I agree with counsel for the co-defendant that if the applicants felt they had an interest in the property, they should have come earlier to be joined so as to protect that interest and also to enable the court make a decision as regards that interest. They failed to do so. And as from the endorsement to the writ, it has not been stated that they were part of it, it is too late in the day for them to be substituted to pursue the intended appeal in place of the surviving plaintiff. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif">