[2012]DLCA6486 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">HANNA BUCKMAN & 3 ORS.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">PATRICK ANKUMAYI & ANOR.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><i><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">[COURT OF APPEAL, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">SUIT NO. H1/66/2012 DATE: 11TH JUNE 2012<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt; border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none; padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%;border:none; mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COUNSEL: <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%;border:none; mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">MR. WILFRED BABA AVIO FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%;border:none; mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> MR. AKWASI BOSOMPEM FOR PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CORAM: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">J. B. AKAMBA J.A. [PRESIDING], K. A. ACQUAYE J. A., A. M. DORDZIE (MRS) J. A.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt; border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none; padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">ACQUAYE, J. A<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> This is an appeal against the judgment delivered on 18th June 2011 by an Accra High Court against the defendants/appellants.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> The plaintiffs issued a writ of summons claiming against the four administrators of the late Kojo Amoah. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">a) A declaration that the late Kojo Amoah in his life time told the plaintiffs and his family both immediate and extended that in appreciation of the financial assistance towards the putting up of House No. B 455/21, North Kaneshie by the late mother of the plaintiffs, the said house should be given to them.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> b) An order directed at the defendants to vest House No. B 445/21 in the plaintiffs in accordance with the wishes and directives of the late Kojo Armah.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> The plaintiffs/respondents case was that their late mother was the uterine sister of the late Kojo Amoah. Their mother died when they were young and Kojo Amoah adopted and took them to live with his wife and children in Accra. He looked after them as his children and when he could not afford financially to look after the 1st plaintiff/respondent at Emit School, he made him stop his education to become his driver in his business as a herbal medicine manufacturer and seller. In his life time Kojo Amoah built four houses in Accra and distributed three of them among three women with whom he had children. He told the women and his family members that the house in which they all lived House No. B. 455/21, North Kaneshie, should on his demise be given to the plaintiffs in view of financial assistance given him by plaintiff’s mother when he was building it. Upon the demise of Kojo Amoah the defendants who are the administrators of his estate have in spite of several protestation and pleas refused to vest the property in them but live therein whilst they have rented out the three houses given to them. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The defendants denied that the plaintiffs were customarily adopted by Kojo Amoah. They stated that at the time their mother, a charcoal seller died the 1st plaintiff was 19 years whilst the 2nd plaintiff was 11 years old and Kojo Amoah brought them to live with his three wives and 18 children in their matrimonial home at House No. B 455/21, North Kaneshie. They denied vehemently that Kojo Amoah ever said that the disputed house should be given to the plaintiffs. They testified that when the 4th defendant, a nephew and customary successor of Kojo Amoah was not cooperating with them as an administrator they met and distributed the estate, maintaining the disputed house as a matrimonial home. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">Even though the plaintiffs denied that the first two defendants were the wives of Kojo Armah the trial judge held them to be wives. The judge also held that the plaintiffs were the adopted children of Kojo Armah and found that Kojo Armah in his lifetime shared his houses among his wives and children and said that the disputed house should be given to the plaintiffs. He therefore ordered the defendants to vest House No. B 455/21 in the plaintiffs.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> It is against this judgment that the defendants have appealed. The grounds of appeal are: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">a) The judgment is against the weight of evidence<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> b) The trial court erred in holding that the late Kojo Amoah customarily adopted the plaintiffs. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">c) The trial court erred in holding that by his conduct the intestate acknowledged the plaintiffs as his adopted children.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">d) The trial court erred in holding that the matrimonial home of the intestate was intended by the deceased to be given to the plaintiffs upon his death. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">e) The trial court erred when it failed to hold that the matrimonial home was for the 18 children of the intestate. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:jus