ANTHONY MENSAH vs. NANA KOFI OWUSU FOSUHENE CAPTAIN (RTD.) NANA ASIAMAH [2012]DLCA7966

Date	2012-06-01
Suit No.	SUIT NO: H1/51/2012
Citation No.	[2012]DLCA7966

MARIAMA OWUSU J.A. (PRESIDING)

FRANCIS KORBIEH J.A.

IRENE DANQUAH J.A.

[2012]DLCA7966
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >ANTHONY MENSAH<o:p></o:p>(PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT)<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p>NANA KOFI OWUSU FOSUHENE<o:p></o:p>(1ST DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p>CAPTAIN (RTD.) NANA ASIAMAH<o:p></o:p>(NON-RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[COURT OF APPEAL, KUMASI]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

</div>CORAM:<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

MARIAMA
OWUSU J.A. (PRESIDING), FRANCIS KORBIEH J.A., IRENE DANQUAH J.A.<o:p></o:p>

</div>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

</div>MARIAMA
OWUSU, J.A:<o:p></o:p>On
10-12-2010, the High Court, Kumasi in an application for an Order of
Interlocutory Injunction ruled that:<o:p></o:p>“In the result, I hereby
grant the 1st defendant/applicant’s application for an Order of
Interlocutory Injunction against the plaintiff, but vary it to include both
parties, their agents, assigns, representatives, servants, workmen, relations,
privies, restraining them from entering upon, building, dealing or interfering
with the land in dispute pending the hearing and determination of the suit.<o:p></o:p>There will be no Order as to
costs.&nbsp; Parties to bear their own costs.”<o:p></o:p>Dissatisfied
with and aggrieved by the ruling of the High Court, Kumasi, the plaintiff filed
the instant appeal.<o:p></o:p>The
Grounds of Appeal are:<o:p></o:p>a.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
That the Honourable Court did not advert
its mind to the fact that the 1st defendant/respondent was estopped
from making any claim having witnessed the transaction between the
plaintiff/appellant and the 2nd defendant.<o:p></o:p>b.