[2013]DLCA3637 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">STEPHEN ARHIN<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">MALLAM ABU</span></b><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua";color:#00B0F0"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">[COURT OF APPEAL, CAPE COAST]</span><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">SUIT NO. H1/223</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma">/2008 </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">DATE: 21</span><sup><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma">TH</span></sup><span style="font-size:10.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma"> MARCH, 2013<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;tab-stops: .5in 1.0in 257.25pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COUNSEL: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">MR. MICHAEL ARTHUR DADZIE FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT <o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CORAM: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">ADJEI, J.A. J.A. (PRESIDING), ACKAH-YENSU, J.A. AND BENSON, J. <o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">JUDGMENT</span></b><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">DENNIS ADJEI, J.A.:<o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">This appeal emanates from the judgment of the High Court, Cape Coast which dismissed the plaintiff’s claim as unproved on 16<sup>th</sup> June, 2008. The plaintiff sued the defendant for:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:justify;text-justify: inter-ideograph;text-indent:-.5in"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">“a. A declaration of title to all that piece or parcel of land at Kasoa-Odupong-Pkehe, sector 8 Block B and described as Plot No. 182, covering an approximate area of 0.30 acres and bounded by plot Nos. 180,181,184 and proposed road.<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> b. Recovery of possession of the said plot of land<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> c. Damages for trespass<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:justify;text-justify: inter-ideograph;text-indent:-.5in"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">d. Perpetual Injunction restraining the defendant, his agents, servants, workmen, assigns etc from interfering with the plaintiff’s title to the land and more particularly from continuing his trespassory etc”.<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The defendant entered appearance and filed his statement of defence. Even though he denied being a trespasser he did not assert ownership to the disputed property. He pleaded further that the land is neither for him nor the plaintiff. The defendant did not take part in the hearing. The plaintiff gave evidence and tendered Exhibits but the trial High Court judge however held that he had failed to prove his title on the preponderance of probabilities. The plaintiff in his appeal raised seven (7) grounds of appeal. The grounds of appeal are as follows:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> “a. <b>The <i>judgment is against the weight of evidence<o:p></o:p></i></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:justify;text-justify: inter-ideograph;text-indent:-.5in"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">b. The Judge with the greatest respect misdirected himself on the onus of proof required of the plaintiff and this occasioned a substantial miscarriage of justice<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:justify;text-justify: inter-ideograph;text-indent:-.5in"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">c. the learned trial Judge misunderstood the legal import of the deed of conveyance tendered with attachments which deed was registered and marked Exhibit ‘A”.<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:justify;text-justify: inter-ideograph;text-indent:-.5in"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">d. the learned Judge holding that Exhibit ‘A’ was forged, was unfounded as there was no evidence before him to that effect.<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:justify;text-justify: inter-ideograph;text-indent:-.5in"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">e. the Judge erred when he held that because reserved rent has not been paid, plaintiff could not assert title to the disputed land.<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:justify;text-justify: inter-ideograph;text-indent:-.5in"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">f. the Judge misdirected himself on the law of Declaration of Title when he held that the Declaration of the Title to the land is discretionary.<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:justify;text-justify: inter-ideograph;text-indent:-.5in"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">g. The Judge did not exercise his discretion fairly when he awarded cost against the plaintiff for the defendant”.<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The defendant was served with Form 6, Plaintiff/Appellants written submission and hearing notice by substituted service. The defendant did not file any written submission and cannot participate in the hearing of the appeal except on the question of costs. Rule 20(8) of C.I. 19 provides that where a respondent does not file a written submission or a joint written submission he shall not be heard on the appeal except on the question of costs.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"