[2013]DLCA6232 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">MARY OKAILEY WELBECK<i><o:p></o:p></i></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; tab-stops:center 3.25in left 427.5pt"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">SIMON TACKIE WELBECK<i><o:p></o:p></i></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">[</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COURT OF APPEAL, ACCRA</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">]</span><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">SUIT NO.H1/167/2012 </span></b><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;"> </span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">DATE: </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">14TH MARCH, 2013<b><o:p></o:p></b></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COUNSEL: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">MR. EDWARD SAM CRABBE FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT· <o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">MR. ABEIKU VROOM FOR DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT <o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CORAM: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: 115%;mso-outline-level:1;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">APALOO J.A. (PRESIDING), ADJEI J.A., SAEED J.A.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: 115%;mso-outline-level:1"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">DENNIS ADJEI, J.A. <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">On 22nd June, 2011 the High Court Accra dismissed the plaintiff/appellant’s action (hereafter called the plaintiff) and entered judgment in favour of the defendant/respondent hereafter called the defendant. The High Court in its judgment held that the last will and testament of the late Joseph Ayikai Welbeck who died on 17th July,1997 was neither forged nor fraudulently obtained and was duly executed in accordance with the Will’s Act, Act 360. The plaintiff dissatisfied with the judgment of the trial High Court filed an appeal against it on 5th July, 2011. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The brief facts of the case culminating in this appeal were that the parties herein were some of the children of the late Joseph Ayikai Welbeck who died on 4th April, 2003. The parties come from different mothers. The will of the deceased dated 17th July, 1997 was admitted to probate by the High Court without a caveat. The plaintiff was given an insignificant amount of ¢10,000.00 (GH¢10.00) by her father in the disputed will and dissatisfied with it thought that it was the defendant who fraudulently made the will in the name of his father and therefore issued a writ to challenge the validity of the will that it was either obtained by fraud or was forged. I will reproduce for discussion the relief sought by the plaintiff on her amended writ of summons filed on 14th April, 2011. They are as follows: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">“i. A declaration that the alleged Will of Joseph Ayikai (deceased) purportedly executed on 17th July 1997 is either forged or was obtained by fraud. <o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">ii. An order invalidating the alleged Will as null and void by reason of forgery and/or fraud Further or in the alternative, <o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">iii. A declaration that the will dated 17th July 1997, not being the last will and testament of Joseph Okai Welbeck (decd), is invalid and cannot form the basis for the administration of his estate. <o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">iv. An order declaring the probate obtained by the defendant for purpose of administering the estate of the deceased under and by virtue of the said will of 17th July,19997, null, void and of no legal effect whatsoever. <o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">v. An order declaring any distribution or purported distribution; or the enforcement or purported enforcement of any directive, carried out or intended to be carried out by the defendant, under or by virtue of the said will of July 17, 1997, null, void and of no legal effect whatsoever. <o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">vi. Any further or other orders”. <o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The trial High Court Judge found that the will of the late Joseph Ayikai Welbeck dated 17th July, 1997 was his last will and was executed in accordance with the Will’s Act, Act 360. The grounds of appeal filed by the plaintiff to impeach the judgment are as follows: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">“a. That the judgment is against the weight of evidence. <o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">b. That in concluding that the alleged will of Joseph Ayikai Welbeck (dcsd) was valid and not forged the trial Judge erred in basing his judgment on conjecture and speculation instead of proven fact, when he held: <o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:justify;line-height: 115%"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqu