[2014]DLCA5023 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:#00B0F0">THE REPUBLIC<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom: .0001pt;mso-add-space:auto;text-align:center"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:#00B0F0">NII DAA NYINAA-NSE II AND 4 OTHERS<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">(RESPONDENTS / APPELLANTS)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">EX PARTE <span style="color:#00B0F0">F.K.A. COMPANY LIMITED </span></span></b><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">(APPLICANT / RESPONDENT)</span></i><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">[COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION), ACCRA]<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">CIVIL APPEAL NO.:H1/91/2014 26<sup>TH</sup> NOVEMBER, 2015<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">MR. YAW OPPONG FOR THE APPELLANTS / RESPONDENTS<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">MR. JEFFERY QUIST FOR THE RESPONDENT / APPELLANT<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">CORAM:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-add-space:auto;text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">MARIAMA OWUSU (MS) JA (PRESIDING), L.L. MENSAH JA, M. M. AGYEMANG (MRS.) JA<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt; border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none; padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><b><u><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">AGYEMANG JA:<o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court, Land Division, Accra where in the appellants, convicted contemnors, were sentenced to fines as well as to the execution of bonds to be of good behaviour for two years or in default one month imprisonment with hard labour.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">These are the matters antecedent to the present appeal:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">The applicant/respondent (hereafter referred to as the respondent) brought an application before the High Court seeking an order of committal of the respondents/appellants (hereafter referred to as the appellants) for contempt of court. The application was supported by a twenty-one paragraph affidavit of the 9<sup>th</sup> of April 2010, and also by three supplementary affidavits dated 28<sup>th</sup> April 2010, 15<sup>th</sup> November 2010, and 1<sup>st</sup> March 2011.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">The respondent is the owner of an expanse of land described as being and lying at New Weija, measuring 95.194 acres, per a customary grant of same from Nii Anto Nyame, former Chief of Weija in 1980 to its Managing Director which was subsequently reduced into writing in favour of the respondent company. After the said grant, the respondent reduced the land into its possession by granting portions to prospective developers, demarcating roads, and extending electricity to the land. The respondent had quiet enjoyment thereof until the death of its grantor.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">The first appellant herein is the successor of Nii Anto Nyame the grantor. In his application for committal of the appellants for contempt, the respondent alleged that by reason of the acts of the first appellant and his elders which were inconsistent with its ownership of the land (including grants the said persons purported to make of portions of the land to certain parties), it brought actions before the High Court in the vindication of its rights. In one such suit described as Suit No. L401/2001; FKA Company Ltd v. Effah Sarkodie, the High Court adjudged him owner of the said tract of land. The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeal in its judgment of 16<sup>th</sup> March 2007 (Civ. App. No. H1/181/2007), and then by the Supreme Court on 27<sup>th</sup> October 2008 (Civ. App. No.JA/33/2007). An application for the review of the Supreme Court’s decision was dismissed by the Supreme Court. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">It was the case of the respondent that the appellants had, in disregard of the said judgments of the courts, trespassed on the said land, and by means of intimidation, harassment, violence, extortion of monies from developers, and purported grants to other parties, pursued the enterprise of dispossessing the respondent and its grantees thereof.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">In the supplementary affidavits, the respondent deposed further that in disregard of the pending application for committal for contempt, one of the purported grantees: the 8<sup>th</sup> respondent herein had persisted in his act of winning sand on the land. It was also deposed that the appellants had purported to grant a portion of the land to certain persons referred to as: Kwantwi Brothers, and furthermore, had by means of violence, prevented officials of the court and the Police, from executing an order of the High Court Coram Elizabeth Ankumah J to demolish structures on the land.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">The respondent also brought to the attention of the court, two judgments of the High Court Coram Agnes Dordzie JA and Aduama-Osei JA. The former dismissed a claim by the Lands Commission against the respondent wherein it was asserted that the land had been compulsorily acquired in 1959 and was therefore government land. In the latter, the respondent had been adjudged owner of the land.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">The appellants opposed the application and denied the allegations. In a supplementary affidavit, they however set out what they considered to be their main defence to the application being: that the land had been adjudged per a judgment of the High Court Coram Senyo Dzamefe J (as he then was) in F.K.A. Company Ltd v. Nii. Daanyinaa-Nse II and 3 Ors Suit No. 72/06, to be