NELSON MARTEY vs. MARY DZAGBLE [2014]DLHC12137

Date	2014-06-02
Suit No.	SUIT NO. IRL/86/08
Citation No.	[2014]DLHC12137

HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE JOHN AJET-NASAM

OPOKU ADJAYE FOR APPLICANT

L S N AKUETTEH FOR RESPONDENT

[2014]DLHC12137
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >NELSON MARTEY<o:p></o:p>(PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>MARY DZAGBLE<o:p></o:p>(DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p>[HIGH COURT, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;">

SUIT NO. IRL/86/08&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; DATE: 2ND&nbsp;MAY 2014<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;">

</div>CORAM<o:p></o:p>HIS
LORDSHIP JUSTICE JOHN AJET-NASAM<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top-width: 1.5pt; border-top-color: windowtext; border-left: none; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; border-right: none; padding: 1pt 0cm;">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:center;border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">RULING<o:p></o:p>

</div>This application
has been brought when the Curt was about to deliver its Judgment.&nbsp; I must say, it has been the diligence of the
Plaintiff that is why this case is still pending.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;Now, they are
asking for an amendment of the Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;The argument of
the defendant amongst others is that the plaintiff’s action will amount to
setting up an entirely new case.&nbsp; My
answer to this is that, the rules allow such.&nbsp;
See Order 16 r 15 of CI 47.&nbsp; The
inordinate of the plaintiff notwithstanding, I will grant the amendment to be
done within (3) three days of this ruling.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;If any party
needed to call further evidence, this will also be granted.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;I however award
cost of One Thousand Ghana Cedis (GH¢1,000.00) to the defendant.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;Application
granted.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;&nbsp;

&nbsp;</main>