OPANIN KWADWO DANSO vs. NANA AMPADU DAADUAM II AND METALEX LTD [2014]DLSC5332

Date	2014-07-23
Suit No.	WRIT NO.J1/13/2013
Citation No.	[2014]DLSC5332

ATUGUBA JSC PRESIDING

ANSAH JSC

ADINYIRA JSC

OWUSU JSC

YEBOAH JSC

BONNIE JSC

GBADEGBA JSC

KWAKU BAAH ESQ. FOR THE PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT.

KIN HUSSEIN IBN ALHASSAN FOR THE 1ST DEFENDANT/ APPLICANT

[2014]DLSC5332
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >OPANIN KWADWO DANSO<o:p></o:p>(PLAINTIFF)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>NANA AMPADU DAADUAM II AND METALEX
LTD<o:p></o:p>(DEFENDANTS)<o:p></o:p>[SUPREME COURT, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

</div>COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p>KWAKU BAAH ESQ. FOR THE PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT.<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

KIN HUSSEIN
IBN ALHASSAN FOR THE 1ST DEFENDANT/ APPLICANT<o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM: <o:p></o:p>ATUGUBA
JSC PRESIDING, ANSAH JSC, ADINYIRA JSC, OWUSU JSC, YEBOAH JSC, BONNIE JSC,
GBADEGBA JSC<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;
padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:center;border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in">RULING<o:p></o:p>

</div>ANIN
YEBOAH JSC:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <o:p></o:p>On 23/07/2014, we upheld the preliminary objection
and dismissed this action. We now proceed to offer our reasons. On the
20/05/2013, the plaintiff herein who is a citizen of Mpraeso and claims to be
an affected subject of Mpraeso stool,( a town in the Eastern Region of Ghana)
sued the defendants herein who are the Chief of Mpraeso and a limited liability
entity respectively before this court. The nature of the case is such that it
would be useful at this stage of this ruling to recap the reliefs sought on the
writ;<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
A declaration
that on a true and proper interpretation of Article 267(1) of the 1992
Constitution of the Republic of Ghana the 1st defendant qua Ohene
“chief” of Mpraeso has no right to sell the stool lands of Mpraeso without the
consent of the substools and subjects under the Mpraeso stool occupied for the
time being by the 1st defendant. <o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
A declaration
that by virtue of Article 36(8) of the 1992 Constitution, the subjects of
stools are entitled to a true and verifiable account of all revenue from stool lands
from chiefs and managers of stool lands.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
An order
directing the 2nd defendant by himself or privies, servants, workers
etc to cease from all activities, development or otherwise on Mpraeso stool
lands leased to it by the 1st defendant.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>Upon service of the writ, the 1st
defendant on 5/7/2013 filed Notice of Intention to raise and rely on
preliminary objection. For a fuller record the preliminary objection was couched
as follows:<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The Honourable Court
should decline jurisdiction on the grounds that this is a civil right dressed
as an “inte</main>