[2015]DLCA7108 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">GHANA HOME LOAN LTD<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">KIMATHI MAWUSE DAKE & 2 ORS<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;text-align:center"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(DEFENDATS/APPELLANTS)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif"">[COURT OF APPEAL, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">SUIT NO.: H1/40/2015 </span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%; font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> DATE: 23RD APRIL, 2015<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt; border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none; padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;border:none; mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COUNSEL: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;border:none; mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">MARCUS OWUSU PEPRAH FOR 1ST AND 2ND DEFENDANTS/APPLICANTS <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;border:none; mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">AMELIA ADJOTEYE FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CORAM: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">MARFUL-SAU J.A. (PRESIDING), ACQUAYE J A., TORKORNOO J. A<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt; border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none; padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">TORKORNOO, J. A.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The Appellants were sued for the sum of $147,038.52, interest thereon at the rate of 18.5% per annum from 10th July, 2012 to date of final payment, and costs of the action. Along with a Statement of Defence to the action, they counterclaimed for <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">a. A declaration that on a proper interpretation of the agreement the interest applied historically by the Plaintiff is wrong.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> b. An order for all true proper and necessary account to be taken between the parties on all payments made and received by Plaintiff to ascertain the correct account between the parties. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">c. A declaration that the agreement between the parties is still subsisting and valid.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">d. A declaration that the suit is caught by the doctrine of lis alibi pendes, is an abuse of process and not maintainable.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The Respondents filed an application for summary judgment which was granted. The judgment can be found on pages 90 and 91 of the Record of Appeal. In her judgment, the learned trial judge cited <b>Sam Jonah v. Duodu-Kumi (2003 - 2004) SC GLR 50</b> in which the Supreme court held that in an application for summary judgment, a court must critically examine the pleadings and be satisfied that there are no triable issues of fact or of law for which a Defendant should be granted leave to defend. She held that in the case before her, the thrust of the defence mounted by defendant was that the rate of interest stated on the Statement of Claim is not what the parties agreed to. She said that after reading Exhibit YE1, she would uphold the submission by counsel for Applicant (Respondent herein) that the agreed interest rate is as stated in the agreement. Further, she was <i>'satisfied that the Defendant has no demonstrable defence to the Plaintiff's claim'.</i> She entered judgment as prayed on 17th June 2013. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">On 10th July 2013, she dismissed an application to set aside the judgment she entered. This ruling can be found on pages 128 and 129 of the Record of Appeal. This appeal was filed against this decision refusing to set aside the summary judgment. Notice of the appeal can be found on pages 130 to 131 of the ROA. The grounds of appeal are:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> a. That the Appellant demonstrated a defence to the Plaintiff's claim and the learned trial judge erred in law in not setting aside the Summary Judgment dated the 17th of June, 2013. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">b. That there is a substantial defect in the Respondents Statement of Claim which is not deserving of a grant of Summary Judgment.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> c. Additional grounds to be filed upon receipt of proceedings and certified true copy of the ruling. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">These additional grounds of appeal can be found on pages 132 and 133. They are:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> 1. The ruling is against the weight of evidence on record before the court. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">2. The learned judge erred in law when she held that the defects on the Respondent's Statement of Claim were irregularities which should have been raised timeously. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Bo