[2015]DLHC3544 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">HARRIET OSEI BEMPOMAH<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">NOBLE DREAM FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED AND AFIA ACHIAA & 2 ORS.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;"> </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">[</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">HIGH COURT (COMMERCIAL DIVISION), KUMASI</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">]</span><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family: Tahoma"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma">SUIT </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">NO.RPC/117/14 </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">DATE: 16</span><sup><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma">TH</span></sup><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma"> NOVEMBER, 2015<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Book Antiqua"">COUNSEL: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">NANA ASANTEWAA ATTAKORAH FOR PLAINTIFFS.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">KOFI QUARSHIE SAM FOR DEFENDANT.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Book Antiqua"">CORAM:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">HER LADYSHIP ANGELINA MENSAH-HOMIAH (MRS.) JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT</span><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri"><o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">JUDGEMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The instant interpleader application was filed by three claimants under order 44 rule 12(1) of the High Court ( Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004 C.I. 47 which states:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> <b><i>A person who makes a claim to or in respect of a property taken or intended to be taken in execution under process of the court, or to the proceeds or value of any such property, shall give notice of the claim to the Registrar ...<o:p></o:p></i></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">How did this come about? Judgment was entered against Noble Dream Financial Services Ltd in favour of Harriet Osei Bempomaa by the Commercial Court, Kumasi. As execution creditor, she sought leave to go into execution and subsequently caused the subject matter of this suit, property numbered Plot 18 A Amakom Brampouso , Kumasi to be attached. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">On 29/12/2014, Afia Achiaa, John Agyekum and Philip Adade Acheampong instructed their solicitors to file a notice of claim under Order 44 rule 12(1) of C.I. 47. Upon service of the said notice on the execution creditor, she in turn caused her solicitors to file a notice to dispute the claim on 12/12/2014. Thereafter, the Registrar of this court brought an application under Order 44 rule 12(4) of CI 47 for an order calling upon the claimants to prove their claims. Pursuant to an order granted by this court on 12/02/2015, the claimants and the execution creditor appeared in court for the determination of the claimants ownership of the said property. The court gave directions making the Claimants, Plaintiffs, and the execution creditor, the defendant. By virtue of Order 32 rule 7<sup>A</sup> of C.I. 47 as amended by CI 87, the parties were ordered to file their witness statements.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">This is a civil action and so the rules regarding proof in civil suits apply, i.e. prove by the preponderance of probabilities. From the facts of this case, the Plaintiffs bear the onus of proof of ownership, having asserted ownership to the property in issue. See Zambrama v Segbedzi (1991) 2 GLR 221 CA ; </span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">Adwubeng v Domfeh (1996-97) SCGLR 660</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">;</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman""> Takoradi Flour Mills v Samir Faris (2005-2006) SCGLR 883</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">;</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman""> Yaa Kwesi v Arhin Davis ( 2007-2008) SCGLR 580;</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> and </span><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">Continental Plastics v IMC Industries- Technik GMBH ( 2009) SCGLR 298 at 307</span><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The 1<sup>st</sup> Plaintiff gave evidence on her behalf and on behalf of the 2<sup>nd</sup> Plaintiff , and the 3<sup>rd</sup> Plaintiff also testified. All the evidence given by the Plaintiffs fall in line and it is as follows: The property in issue was first acquired by one Kwadwo Nsiah as per a lease exhibited to the application. After his demise, Letters of Administration were given to F.K. Agyekum and Kwabena Awuah (both deceased).The 3<sup>rd</sup> Plaintiff, Philip Adade Acheampong is the customary successor of the last administrator of the estate of Kwadwo Nsiah i.e. Kwabena Awuah. The 1st and 2<sup>nd</sup> Plaintiffs are the wife and son respectively of the late Kwabena Awuah. Kwabena Awuah shared rooms in the said house among family members, including the 1<sup>st</sup> Plaintiff who has lived there all her life. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The 3<sup>rd</sup> Plaintiff was granted Letters of Administration in respect of the estate of Kwabena Awuah and the family agreed that he takes care of the property in dispute. During the lifetime of Kwadwo Nsiah, he put up a mud house on a portion of the land in dispute. After his demise, the 3<sup>rd</sup> Plaintiff's brother put up six stores on a portion of the vacant land in front of the mud house. The 3<sup>rd</sup> Plaintiff, with the consent of the family of Kwadwo Nsiah, authorized one Oppong Kyekyeku to negotiate with and enter into an agreement with Noble Dream Financial Services Ltd in respect of a portion of the property in issue. Subsequent agreements were also executed between Noble Dream, and the said Oppong Kyekyeku. All the Plaintiffs admitted during cross-examination that they are fully aware of the agreement between their family and Noble Dream.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p