[2015]DLHC3567 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">THE REPUBLIC<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">MORO ISSAH<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;"> [HIGH COURT (COMMERCIAL DIVISION), KUMASI]</span><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma">CASE </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">NO.CC/05/15 </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">DATE: </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">2</span><sup><span style="font-size:10.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma">ND</span></sup><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma"> JUNE, 2015<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">CORAM:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">HER LADYSHIP ANGELINA MENSAH-HOMIAH (MRS.) JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri"><o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">JUDGEMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The accused person before me has been charged on one count of Possession of Narcotic Drugs Without lawful Authority, contrary to section 2(1) of PNDCL 236. The particulars of the offence are that on 29/05/2014, the accused had in his possession ten (10) black polythene parcels of cannabis with net weight of 818.3080 grams.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">A summary of the facts which led to this case are that at about 3pm on 29/04/2014, the accused was arrested by members of Old Zongo Community Watch Committee at the Kumasi Central Market on suspicion of carrying narcotic drugs. When the complainants collected a black polythene bag which he was holding, it was found to contain ten (10) black parcels of dried leaves suspected to be cannabis. He was handed over to the Drug Law Enforcement Unit ( DLUE), Kumasi and after further investigations and on the advice of the Attorney General, he was charged with the offence.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">This being a criminal trial, the burden of proof of the offence rests on the prosecution. Under sections 11(2) and 13(1) of the Evidence Act, NRCD 323 the prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">Section 2 (1) of PNDC law 236 provides as follows:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> "A person who, without lawful authority, the proof of which lies on that person, has possession or control of a narcotic drug commits an offence."<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The prosecution must prove the under listed ingredients of the offence beyond reasonable doubt so as to secure a conviction:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in; mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">1.<span style="font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman";"> </span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The accused had custody or control of the drugs<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in; mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">2.<span style="font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman";"> </span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">He knew of the presence of the drugs ; and<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in; mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">3.<span style="font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman";"> </span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">He knew of the nature of the drugs possessed.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left:0in;mso-add-space:auto; text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif""> Atuguba JSC in the case of Bonsu v The Republic ( 1999-2000) SCGLR 199 at pages 225 to 226 stated among other things that " A person who does not even know the nature and quality of the substance he possesses cannot be said to be engaged in illicit dealing in narcotic drugs but is merely a luckless victim whom our legislature, prima facie does not hold to ransom..."<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left:0in;mso-add-space:auto; text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left:0in;mso-add-space:auto; text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif"">Similarly, in the case of Ellis Tamakloe v The Republic (Unreported) Criminal Appeal J3/2/2009, 17/02/2010 SC, Ansah JSC stated with approval the Ghanaian view on possession of narcotic drugs as expressed by Ollennu JSC in Amartey v The State (1964) GLR 256 at 261 thus:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin-left:0in;mso-add-space:auto; text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif""> " What is the possession proof of which without more makes a person guilty of an offence under the section 47(1) unless he proved that his possession was lawful. Upon a proper construction of the section, the possession must be possession with knowledge of the nature and quality of the article; that he possessed awareness that what he possessed is 'opium or Indian hemp'; or residue from the smoking of 'opium or Indian hemp'. Physical possession without that knowledge is no offence. Without that knowledge there is no legal possession which can support the charge. Therefore to succeed on such a charge, the prosecution must prove legal possession; that is in addition to proving physical or constructive possession, they must go further to lead evidence which establishes that the defendant had the requisite knowledge or evidence from which it will be reasonable to presume that the defendant proved to be in possession well knew or ought to have known, that the article he possessed was 'opium or Indian hemp', or was 'residue from smoking of opium or Indian hemp." See also Nyameneba v The State (1965) GLR 723 SC which also followed the decision in Amartey v The State, supra