[2015]DLHC3569 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">THE REPUBLIC<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">PHILIP NYARKO<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;"> [HIGH COURT (COMMERCIAL DIVISION), KUMASI]</span><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma">CASE </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">NO.155/15 </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">DATE: </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">8</span><sup><span style="font-size:10.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma">TH</span></sup><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma"> MAY, 2015<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">CORAM:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">HER LADYSHIP ANGELINA MENSAH-HOMIAH (MRS.) JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri"><o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">JUDGEMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">Standing trial before this court on a charge of possessing narcotic drug without authority is a 22 year old male adult. Specifically, he has been charged under Section 2(1) of the Narcotic Drugs (Control, Enforcement and Sanctions) Act 1990 PNDC law 236 which states:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> Section 2 Prohibition on possession of narcotic drugs <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> "(1) A person who, without lawful authority, the proof of which lies on that person, has possession or control of a narcotic drug commits an offence." <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">A summary of the facts of this case are that the accused was arrested for stealing and was detained at the Suame Police Station. Police intelligence revealed that the accused was dealing in narcotic drugs. The accused was escorted by the complainants who are police personnel, to his room at Suame. Upon a careful search, 15 wraps of cannabis, some compressed cannabis in a brown paper and GH¢ 6.00 were found hidden in a wardrobe wrapped in a violet polythene bag. During investigations, accused admitted ownership of the cannabis and stated that he had been selling to smokers at GH¢1.00 per wrap. The exhibits tested positive for Cannabis when tested by the Ghana Standard Authority. They weighed 23.9298 grams and 88.7413 grams respectively.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> The prosecution is enjoined by sections 11(2) and 13(1) of the Evidence Act, 1975 NRCD 323 to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the cannabis in issue was found in the possession of the accused person. Conversely, the burden of proving lawful possession rests on the accused. Two witnesses testified for the prosecution. By their evidence, they are the police personnel detailed to conduct a search in the accused person's room where these exhibits were found. PW1, Detective Sergeant Favour Adukpo's evidence was very concise and the relevant part is as follows:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> " ... Accused willingly led police to their house and pointed a room to police as where he and his mother were occupying. We conducted a thorough search in the room and I found a polythene bag containing 15 wraps and one compressed one all suspected to be Indian hemp at that time. I showed the stuff to the accused in the room. In the presence of my colleagues, accused admitted ownership of these stuff. There was GH¢6 in GH¢1 denomination in the bag. He told police that he had been selling the stuff to people and that is what he does for a living. Accused person was escorted to the charge office together with the exhibits ..."<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">PW2, General Corporal Emmanuel Kwadwo Sosu of Suame Station CID corroborated the evidence of PW1 in the foregoing paragraph. He added that the accused told them he smokes as well. He tendered in evidence the investigation and charge cautioned statement of the accused as exhibits A and E. Similarly, he tendered the cannabis which he and PW1 found as exhibit C and the advice from the Attorney General's office as exhibit B.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">In cross-examination, the accused challenged the evidence of PW1 and PW2 that exhibit C was found in his room and suggested to them that another person whom he was fighting with, resulting in his initially arrest at the police station, could have planted the cannabis in his room. He also said in cross-examination that he never told the police he is a "wee" smoker. However, both prosecution witnesses maintained their evidence that exhibit C was found in a room which the accused pointed out to them, he admitted ownership in their presence and also indicated that he sells and smokes "wee".<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">In exhibit A, which the accused relied on in exhibit E, he stated thus:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> "... The police officers escorted me to my house at Suame and I led them to my room. During the search, the police saw 15 wrappers of dried leaves and a compressed one all suspected to