[2016]DLCA4542 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">NII AMARKAI III ASERE DZASETSE AND ACTING ASERE MANTSE<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">TEIKO OKAI (SUBT. BY NII TACKIE AMOAH IV) AND 2 OTHERS<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(1ST DEFENDANT /RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">[COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION), ACCRA]<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CIVIL APPEAL H1/234/2015 DATE: 24<sup>TH</sup> MARCH 2016<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">MR. GEORGE ESHUN FOR APPELLANT<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">MR. STEPHEN GRAY FOR 1ST DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CORAM: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">OFOE JA (PRESIDING), ACQUAYE JA, AGYEMANG (MRS.) JA <o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt; border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none; padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">J U D G M E N T<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">AGYEMANG JA:-<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">In this appeal the plaintiff/appellant (described hereafter alternately as the plaintiff or the appellant) seeks a reversal of the judgment of the High Court, dated 31st March 2015 and furthermore, that judgment be entered for him.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The matters giving rise to the appeal are the following:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">There is a village with a number of settlements in the Greater Accra Region referred to as Danchira lands. The plaintiff describes the lands as bounded on the North by Manhean and Ashaladza lands, on the south by Amanfro lands, on the east by Baanyebi Kpakpoand lands at Foma and Afuaman lands up to the Densu River, and on the West by Akim Abuakwa land, with a total acreage of 18,665 acres. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The plaintiff brought suit against the defendants at the court below claiming inter alia, a declaration of title to the said lands and damages for trespass thereto. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">It was the case of the plaintiff: the Asere Dzasetse and acting Asere Mantse who brought suit on behalf of the Asere Stool, that this was ancestral property that had been wrongfully and fraudulently appropriated by the first defendant whose Djanbi Amu family of Otublohum had fraudulently caused the second and third defendants to register it as the owner thereof.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">According to the plaintiff, the fraud was perpetrated when one John Ayiku Mensah of the Djanbi Amu family swore to a statutory declaration claiming that family’s ownership of the lands, and supported same with a site plan prepared by order of the court in a suit brought by the plaintiff’s forbears: Nii Akramah II and Nii Teiko I, against the defendant’s ancestor Teiko Armah: Suit No. 18/61. It was the plaintiff’s pleading that the court-appointed surveyor one E.H. Sagoe submitted his report to the court in 1964, but that it was not used to determine the dispute as the case was adjourned sine die upon the death of the parties. The said site plan to which was attached a statutory declaration of John Ayiku Mensah was allegedly used by him to register the said Djanbi Amu family as the owner of Danchira lands. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">Thus did the plaintiff on behalf of the Asere stool commence suit at the court below seeking a declaration of title to the lands afore-described, damages for trespass to the said land, as well as a declaration that the statutory declaration upon which the first defendant’s Djanbi Amu family’s ownership of the Danchira lands was hinged, was an act of fraud.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The first defendant denied the said allegations and counterclaimed for a lesser area of land with an area of 13,774 acres, situate and lying at Danchira, bounded on the North west by the Hony Stream measuring 10,200 feet more or less, on the Northeast by Manhia, Ashalaja, and Afuaman lands measuring 51,700 feet more or less, on the east by Joma lands, Densu River and Kwami Amu’s land measuring 10,300 feet more or less, on the South by Banyibe Pond, Amanfro and Domeabra lands measuring 17,500 feet more or less and on the Southwest by Amanfro lands measuring 3,500 feet more or less. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">It was the first defendant’s case that his Djanbi Amu family was the allodial owner of the Danchira lands, and that the family had vindicated its title thereto in a number of suits, both before the traditional court, such as in the suit between Leonard Lanquaye Lamptey v. Nii Nikoi Olai Amontia IV Asere Mantse decided by the Judicial Committee of the Ga Traditional Council in favour of the Djanbi Amu family, and before the Superior Courts. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">At the close of hearing, the learned trial judge in his judgment held that the judgment of the Court of Appeal in the case of: F.K.A. Company Ltd &Anor v. Nii Ayikai Akramah III (Deceased) substituted by Nii Tetteh Okorli-Aryee and 4 Ors Civil Appeal No. H1/98/2014 decided 12th February 2015 (Unreported),had settled theissue of the ownership of Danchira lands. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">Expressing himself to be bound by the Court of Appeal decision upon a principle of stare decisis, the learned trial judge held that in the circumstance, no useful end would be attained by inquiring into the question of fraud regarding the manner in which the statutory declaration to which was attached a site plan asserting the title of the Djanbi Amu family was procured. Thus he dismissed the plaintiff’s claim and entered judgment for the first defendant upon his counterclaim. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">It is against the said judgment that the present appeal has been brought.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The plaintiff filed three grounds of appeal which we reproduce as follows:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-