[2016]DLCA7976 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0">GEORGE FIANKO SACKEY</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0"> </span><i><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">(DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS)</span></i><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif"> <b><span style="color:#00B0F0">AND UNIQUE TRUST FINANCIAL SERVICES</span></b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0">AUGUSTINA QUAYE</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;color:#00B0F0"> </span><i><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">(PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS)</span></i><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif"> <b><span style="color:#00B0F0">AND PATIENCE QUAYE</span></b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0">(Suing per their lawful attorney Emmanuel Lartey Quaye)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">[COURT OF APPEAL, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm; mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">CIVIL APPEAL NO:. H1/113/2016 <i> </i>DATE: 14<sup>TH</sup> APRIL, 2016<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-bidi-font-style:italic">COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">F. K. YEBOAH FOR THE PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">KOFI SOMUAH FOR THE DEFENDANTS /APPELLANTS<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-bidi-font-style:italic">CORAM: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">V. D. OFOE J.A. (PRESIDING), K. A. ACQUAYE J.A., WELBOURNE (MRS.) J.A.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt; border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none; padding:1.0pt 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%;border:none; mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><u><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-bidi-font-style:italic">K .A. ACQUAYE, J.A.<o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">This judgment is in respect of an appeal lodged against a judgment delivered by a High Court in Accra, in respect of two consolidated suits on 21<sup>st</sup> day of January 2010. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">In the first suit, the plaintiffs/respondents, through their lawful attorney, issued a writ of summons claiming against the defendants/appellants:.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">A declaration of title to a parcel of land containing an approximate area of 0.15 acres being at Kwashieman in Accra as described in the site plan attached.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">Perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs’ quiet enjoyment of the said land.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">Damages for trespass against the defendants. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">In the second suit, the plaintiffs/respondents issued a writ claiming in addition to the claims in the first writ a claim for declaration of title to house number B 916/33, Awoshie, Accra.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">The attorney of the plaintiff who testified on behalf of his principals tendered the power of attorney created in his favour in evidence which was admitted as exhibit A. He told the court that he went to the Land Title Registry in 2001 with his father’s indenture and site plan to register the subject matter of this suit in the name of his father who died on 14<sup>th</sup> August 1990. At the Land Title Registry he was informed that the 1<sup>st</sup> defendant had registered the land in the name of the 1<sup>st</sup> defendants father Ebenezer Adolphus Sackey. The attorney testified that it was his father Albert Lakotey Quaye who built the house on the land in which he has lived since 1977. He complained that the 1<sup>st</sup> defendant had used the house to secure a loan from the 2<sup>nd</sup> defendant hence his claims. The attorney admitted under cross-examination that on 19<sup>th</sup> March 2004 an auctioneer called Aryee and Court Bailiffs came to eject occupants of an adjoining house but he has since set aside the judgment the 1<sup>st</sup> defendant obtained in that suit.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">The 1<sup>st</sup> defendant testified that his father Ebenezer Adolfus Sackey bought the land from Gbawe Tawiah in 1960 and tendered a copy of the registered document as exhibit 1. The 1<sup>st</sup> defendant testified that the land acquired by his father measured 110 feet by 160 feet and he named some of his boundary owners. He said that his father put up a building on the land in 1968 and after his father’s death in 1984 he and his brother obtained letters of administration to his estate. Later he acquired a Land Title Certificate which he tendered as exhibit 5. He subsequently mortgaged the property to secure a loan from the 2<sup>nd</sup> defendant. He denied the claims of the plaintiffs and counterclaimed for a declaration of title to the property contained in his Land Title Certificate, order for recovery of possession and perpetual injunction.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">In his judgment the trial judge found that the parties were claiming title to the same piece of land. The trial judge also found that when the defendants went to inspect the land before the mortgage they found people living in one of the houses thereon yet they failed to question those living in the house as to who owned it so the registration by the 1<sup>st</sup> defendant was not conclusive evidence of title. The trial judge preferred the evidence of the plaintiff that his father was in possession of the land and started building on it because the 1<sup>st</sup> defendant testified that he was in Britain and did not see his father putting up a building on the land. The trial judge held that having been in adverse possession of the land for more than twelve years the plaintiff was entitled to remain in occupation of the land as the 1<sup>st</sup> defendant’s right to recover the land had been extinguished by Section 110 of the Limitation Act NRCD 54 of 1972. The trial judge also found that the plaintiffs’ father built on the land in good faith so he was entitled to protection under the Land Development (Protection of Purchasers) Act 2 of 1960. The trial judge thus dismissed the counterclaims of the defendants and granted the claims of the plaintiffs.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">Dissatisfied with the judgment the 1<sup>st</sup> defendant filed a notice of appeal setting forth eight grounds of appeal.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNo